Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;57(19):12050–12055. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01607

Table 1. Comparison of the H2 Adsorption Properties for a Variety of the Best-Behaving MOFs at 77 K.

material BET surface area (m2 g–1) pore volume (cm3 g–1) crystal densitya (g cm–3) H2 uptake at 1 bar (wt %) density of adsorbed H2 at 1 bar (g cm–3) saturated excess H2 uptake (mg g–1) total H2 uptake (mg g–1) total volumetric uptake (g L–1) density of adsorbed H2 at high pressure (g cm–3) Qst for H2 at zero coverage (kJ mol–1)
MFM-132a 2466 1.06 0.65 2.83 0.026 63 80 (60 bar) 52 (60 bar) 0.075 (60 bar) 6.7
MFM-112a (NOTT-112)18 3800 1.62 0.503 2.3 0.014 76.1 98 (60 bar) 49 (60 bar) 0.06 (60 bar) 5.6
NU-10019b 6143 2.82 0.279 1.82 0.006 99.5 164 (70 bar) 46 (70 bar) 0.058 (70 bar) 6.1
PCN-6619a 4000 1.63 0.45 1.79 0.011 66.5 (45 bar) 96 (60 bar) 43 (60 bar) 0.059 (60 bar) 6.22
PCN-6819a 5109 2.13 0.38 1.87 0.009 73.2 (50 bar) 115 (60 bar) 44 (60 bar) 0.054 (60 bar) 6.09
UTSA-2021 1156 0.63 0.91 2.9 0.046          
SNU-522 2850 1.0 0.768 2.87 0.028 52 68 (50 bar) 52 (50 bar) 0.068 (50 bar) 11.6
MOF-17721,22 4746 1.59 0.427 1.2 0.008 75 106 (60 bar) 45 (60 bar) 0.067 (60 bar) 4.4
MOF-523 3800 1.54 0.59 1.5 0.01 75 92 (60 bar) 60 (60 bar) 0.06 (60 bar)  
MOF-21024 6240 3.6 0.25     86 156 (60 bar) 39 (60 bar) 0.043 (60 bar)  
a

Calculated crystal density based upon the crystal structures with all guest solvent molecules and coordinated H2O molecules removed from the structural models.