Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 3;18:163. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1167-4

Table 4.

Poisson regression analysis

Prevalence ratios (PR) with 95% CI
Unadjusted model Adjusted model 1 Adjusted model 2
PR PR PR
Frontal signs
 Mildly-impaired 4.7 (3.8–5.8) 3.9 (3.1–4.9) 3.8 (2.9–4.9)
 Heavily-impaired 15.0 (12.1–18.6) 9.5 (7.4–12.1) 6.7 (5.0–8.9)
Extrapyramidal signs
 Mildly-impaired 4.2 (3.4–5.0) 2.9 (2.4–3.6) 2.5 (2.0–3.1)
 Heavily-impaired 10.0 (8.1–12.3) 5.4 (4.3–6.9) 3.3 (2.5–4.3)
Cerebellar signs
 Mildly-impaired 4.2 (3.6–5.0) 2.8 (2.4–3.4) 2.4 (2.0–3.0)
 Heavily-impaired 8.9 (7.2–10.7) 4.8 (3.9–6.0) 2.9 (2.2–3.7)
Gait disturbance signs
 Mildly-impaired 3.5 (2.3–5.1) 2.5 (1.7–3.7) 2.1 (1.3–3.3)
 Heavily-impaired 3.9 (3.3–4.5) 2.3 (1.9–2.7) 2.0 (1.7–2.4)

Multivariate regression analysis of dementia at baseline by four factor scores derived from the NEUROEX assessment at baseline. Prevalence ratios (PR) in the sample pooled across countries (with 95% CI) are shown for an unadjusted model, a model adjusted for socio-demographical variables (adjusted for gender, educational level, food insecurity, income insecurity, number of assets and age; adjusted model 1) and a model adjusted for socio-demographical variables and general indicators of health status (adjusted for gender, educational level, food insecurity, income insecurity, number of assets, age, depression, care dependence, clinically diagnosed stroke, diabetes and hypertension; adjusted model 2)