Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 3;18:163. doi: 10.1186/s12883-018-1167-4

Table 5.

Cox proportional hazard model regression analysis

Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CI
Unadjusted model Adjusted model 1 Adjusted model 2
HR HR HR
Frontal signs
 Mildly-impaired 1.2 (1.1–1.2) 1.1 (1.1–1.2) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 Heavily-impaired 2.1 (2.0–2.3) 1.9 (1.7–2.1) 1.6 (1.4–1.8)
Extrapyramidal signs
 Mildly-impaired 1.3 (1.2–1.3) 1.2 (1.1–1.2) 1.1 (1.1–1.2)
 Heavily-impaired 1.9 (1.7–2.1) 1.7 (1.5–1.9) 1.4 (1.3–1.6)
Cerebellar signs
 Mildly-impaired 1.5 (1.4–1.6) 1.4 (1.3–1.5) 1.3 (1.2–1.4)
 Heavily-impaired 1.7 (1.5–1.9) 1.6 (1.4–1.7) 1.3 (1.1–1.5)
Gait disturbance signs
 Mildly-impaired 1.1 (1.0–1.3) 1.0 (0.9–1.2) 1.0 (0.8–1.1)
 Heavily-impaired 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 1.1 (1.0–1.1) 1.0 (0.9–1.0)

Multivariate prediction analysis of mortality at follow up by four factor scores derived from the NEUROEX assessment at baseline. Hazard ratios (HR) pooled over countries (with 95% CI) are shown for an unadjusted model, a model adjusted for socio-demographical variables (adjusted for gender, educational level and age; adjusted model 1) and a model adjusted for socio-demographical variables and general indicators of health status (adjusted for gender, educational level, age, depression, clinically diagnosed stroke, diabetes, hypertension and dementia; adjusted model 2)