Table 3. Genomic Control Inflation Factor (λGC) analyses of GWAS models as a function of three different methodsa for adjusting population structure.
Q only models | λGC | Model Rankingb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait | nMDSQ | PCAQ | STRQ | nMDSQ | PCAQ | STRQ |
After Cooking Blackening | 1.569 | 1.586 | 1.571 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Brightness | 1.823 | 2.105 | 1.785 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Days to Emergence | 1.286 | 1.378 | 1.244 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Dormancy Break | 1.086 | 1.25 | 1.186 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Dry Matter | 2.453 | 2.45 | 2.494 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Enzymatic Browning | 1.388 | 1.613 | 1.457 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Ethylene treated tubers sprouting | 1.59 | 1.562 | 1.519 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Eye Depth | 1.666 | 1.481 | 1.578 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Flesh Color | 1.922 | 3.062 | 1.966 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Foliage | 1.168 | 1.302 | 1.132 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Frying Color | 2.254 | 2.4 | 2.244 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Maturity | 1.449 | 1.428 | 1.622 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Plant Height | 1.554 | 1.692 | 1.426 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
stems per Plant | 1.444 | 1.474 | 1.297 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Stolon Attachment | 1.678 | 1.289 | 1.601 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Total Tubers | 1.404 | 1.991 | 1.319 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Tuber Shape | 1.888 | 2.035 | 2.075 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Tuber Uniformity | 1.593 | 1.548 | 1.621 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Tubers per Stem | 1.629 | 1.572 | 1.653 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Yield | 1.693 | 1.86 | 1.723 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
QK modelsc | λGC | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait | nMDSQK | PCAQK | STRQK | |||
After Cooking Blackening | 0.944 | 0.977 | 0.956 | |||
Brightness | 0.906 | 0.91 | 0.92 | |||
Days to Emergence | 0.991 | 0.975 | 0.976 | |||
Dormancy Break | 0.97 | 0.974 | 1.003 | |||
Dry Matter | 0.925 | 0.953 | 0.931 | |||
Enzymatic Browning | 0.945 | 0.964 | 0.947 | |||
Ethylene treated tubers sprouting | 0.971 | 0.991 | 0.955 | |||
Eye Depth | 0.977 | 0.908 | 0.93 | |||
Flesh Color | 0.878 | 0.861 | 0.9 | |||
Foliage | 0.964 | 0.991 | 0.927 | |||
Frying Color | 0.957 | 0.993 | 0.969 | |||
Maturity | 0.928 | 0.943 | 1.001 | |||
Plant Height | 1.026 | 1.086 | 1.037 | |||
stems per Plant | 0.97 | 0.988 | 0.965 | |||
Stolon Attachment | 0.968 | 0.954 | 0.951 | |||
Total Tubers | 0.972 | 0.949 | 0.914 | |||
Tuber Shape | 0.975 | 0.968 | 0.981 | |||
Tuber Uniformity | 1.007 | 1.025 | 1.021 | |||
Tubers per Stem | 0.956 | 0.969 | 0.952 | |||
Yield | 0.978 | 1.011 | 0.982 |
nMDS, non-metric multidimensional scaling; PCA, principal component analysis; STR, STRUCTURE.
1, first; 2, second; 3, third.
QK models not ranked as inclusion of K in GWAS models brought λGC close to 1 for all three Q methods tested.