Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;8(10):3185–3202. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200377

Table 4. Genomic Control Inflation Factor (λGC) analyses of four principal GWAS models.

Trait λGC Model Rankinga
Naïve K Q QK Naïve K Q QK
After Cooking Blackening 2.405 0.93 1.569 0.944 4 2 3 1
Brightness 2.17 0.892 1.823 0.906 4 2 3 1
Days to Emergence 1.816 0.969 1.286 0.991 4 2 3 1
Dormancy Break 2.243 0.986 1.086 0.97 4 1 3 2
Dry Matter 2.987 0.943 2.453 0.925 4 1 3 2
Enzymatic Browning 1.868 0.95 1.388 0.945 4 1 3 2
Ethylene treated tubers sprouting 2.324 0.965 1.59 0.971 4 2 3 1
Eye Depth 2.255 0.928 1.666 0.977 4 2 3 1
Flesh Color 4.251 0.881 1.922 0.878 4 1 3 2
Foliage 1.964 0.991 1.168 0.964 4 1 3 2
Frying Color 3.195 0.987 2.254 0.957 4 1 3 2
Maturity 1.53 1.012 1.449 0.928 4 2 3 1
Plant Height 1.994 1.048 1.554 1.026 4 2 3 1
stems per Plant 1.867 0.963 1.444 0.97 4 2 3 1
Stolon Attachment 1.667 0.947 1.678 0.968 3 2 4 1
Total Tubers 2.021 0.953 1.404 0.972 4 2 3 1
Tuber Shape 2.153 0.963 1.888 0.975 4 2 3 1
Tuber Uniformity 1.749 1.025 1.593 1.007 4 2 3 1
Tubers per Stem 1.825 1.003 1.629 0.956 4 2 3 1
Yield 3.276 0.987 1.693 0.978 4 1 3 2
a

1, first; 2, second; 3, third; 4, fourth; for cases where λGC was deflated (below 1), models closest to ‘1’ were ranked highest.