Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 14;8(10):3185–3202. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200377

Table 5. Significant marker-trait associations (MTAs) in the potato GWAS panel.

Trait Markera Chr Position (bp) GWAS model Thresholdb -log10(p)
Eye Depth solcap_snp_c1_8019 10 48863165 K, QK 5 13.15, 13.54
Flesh Color solcap_snp_c2_20285 3 49393382 K, QK 5 8.67, 7.84
Foliage solcap_snp_c2_50302 5 5055763 K, QK 5 7.38, 6.54
Plant Height solcap_snp_c2_50302 5 5055763 K 5 5.3
Stolon Attachment solcap_snp_c2_50302 5 5055763 K, QK 5 6.02, 5.39
solcap_snp_c1_14802 5 5051766 K, QK 5 5.35, 5.44
Tuber Shape solcap_snp_c1_8019 10 48863165 K, QK 5 14.7, 13.85
a

Only most significant MTAs are shown; where K and QK did not detect the same SNP as the most significant MTA, the top most MTAs from both models are included.

b

p-value significance threshold according to Bonferroni correction at 5% genome-wide false positive rate.