Figure 4.

Forest plots showing hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite end points and their individual components, comparing sarcomere mutation carriers (SARC+), patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) without sarcomere mutations (SARC−), and carriers of a variant of unknown significance (SARC VUS) cohorts. A, SARC+ vs SARC−: Sarcomere mutation carriers have a higher risk of all individual components of the composite end points compared with patients with HCM without sarcomere mutations. B, SARC VUS vs SARC−: SARC VUS patients have a higher risk of the overall composite end point, death, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) firing, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure (HF) with ejection fraction (EF) >55%. C, SARC+ vs SARC VUS: SARC+ and SARC VUS patients have similar risks except for a markedly higher hazard for left ventricular (LV) EF <35% and need for cardiac transplantation or ventricular assist device (VAD) in SARC+ patients. NYHA indicates New York Heart Association.