Figure 5. No significant monotonic adaptation effect of number in the parietal localizer regions.

(a) ${\overrightarrow{\beta }}_{MonoAdapt}$ in the localizer ROI displayed as red star in two plots as β_{MonoAdapt – Num} plotted against β_{MonoAdapt – Sz and as} β_{MonoAdapt – Sp.}Red ellipses indicate the standard error of the estimates. Dashed lines indicate where ${\overrightarrow{\beta }}_{MonoAdapt}$ would fall if monotonic adaptation was exactly proportional to the feature abbreviation labeling it. (b) Bars indicate coefficients for the monotonic adaptation number, size, and spacing regressors within the subject-specific localizer ROI. Error bars indicate standard errors across subjects. The number of the items in the preceding stimulus had no significant effect on current activation. (c) θs (angle between feature line and ${\overrightarrow{\beta }}_{MonoAdapt}$) for each feature. There were no significant differences between features.