Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;2018:7352735. doi: 10.1155/2018/7352735

(c) Acupuncture on and around the day of ET versus control (sham, placebo, no acupuncture)

Study Outcomes Number of participants(studies) Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Relative effect (95% CI) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Cheong YC 2013 LBR 2505(8 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious not serious OR 1.22(0.87,1.70) LOW
OPR 2807(10 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious not serious OR 1.10(0.80,1.52) LOW
CPR 3632(14 RCTs) serious not serious not serious not serious serious OR 1.11(0.87,1.42) LOW
MR 616(6 RCTs) serious not serious not serious not serious serious OR 1.10(0.73,1.67) LOW

Zheng CH 2012 LBP 1647(4 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious not serious OR 0.87(0.70,1.07) LOW
CPR 4418(14 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious not serious OR 1.12(0.89,1.42) LOW

Tarek ET 2009 CPR 1993(9 RCTs) serious very serious not serious not serious not serious RR 1.16(0.92,1.48) VERY LOW

Shen CJ 2015 CPR 859(4 RCTs) serious very serious not serious not serious serious RR 1.39(0.90,2.13) VERY LOW

Qian Y 2017 CPR 4513(16 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious not serious OR 1.19(0.95,1.50) LOW

FU SJ 2016 LBR 1756(7 RCTs) serious very serious not serious not serious not serious RR 1.06(0.79,1.42) VERY LOW
CPR 2668(10 RCTs) serious very serious not serious not serious not serious RR 1.07(0.86,1.33) VERY LOW
OPR 1729(5 RCTs) serious serious not serious not serious serious RR 1.05(0.69,1.69) VERY LOW
MR 772(6 RCTs) serious not serious not serious not serious serious RR 1.15(0.83,1.59) LOW