Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2018 Apr 29;78(12):889–895. doi: 10.1002/pros.23645

Table 3.

Associations of potential baseline covariates with CRPC and OS

Covariates CRPC, HR (95%CI) P-value OS, HR (95%CI) P-value
Gleason score = 7 vs. ≤ 6 (ref) 0.9 (0.67 – 1.22) 0.508 0.85 (0.58 – 1.24) 0.398
Gleason score ≥ 8 vs. ≤ 6 (ref) 1.25 (0.96 – 1.63) 0.093 1.26 (0.91 – 1.74) 0.166
Median PSA (one log10 unit change) 1.33 (1.19 – 1.48) < 0.001 1.23 (1.09 – 1.4) 0.001
Median Age > 62 vs. ≤ 62 years (ref) 1.04 (0.85 – 1.26) 0.721 1.19 (0.94 – 1.49) 0.142
ECOG PS ≥ 1 vs. = 0 (ref) 1.22 (0.89 – 1.67) 0.217 1.23 (0.86 – 1.77) 0.257
Pain vs. No pain (ref) 1.47 (1.17 – 1.86) 0.001 1.56 (1.19 – 2.04) 0.001
Year of diagnosis < 2004 vs. > 2009 (ref) 0.49 (0.32 – 0.73) < 0.001 0.74 (0.4 – 1.37) 0.337
Year of diagnosis 2004 – 2009 vs. > 2009 (ref) 0.92 (0.62 – 1.38) 0.694 1.32 (0.71 – 2.44) 0.377
Extent of disease Bone plus/minus node vs. Node only (ref) 1.28 (1 – 1.65) 0.048 1.58 (1.14 – 2.19) 0.006
Extent of disease Viscera plus any vs. Node only (ref) 0.92 (0.59 – 1.45) 0.722 1.12 (0.63 – 2) 0.698

Trend-test = test of trend effect (Bone only vs. Node only vs. Bone plus node vs. Viscera plus any)

CRPC = castration-resistant prostate cancer; OS = overall survival; ref = reference