Skip to main content
. 2018;19(8):2031–2041. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.8.2031

Table 2.

Characteristics of Included Studies Based on TTM, SCT and SHEP Models

First Author/Year/ location “Study Method/sample” Model Intervention Outcome “quality rating EPHPP”
Ghahremani et al, (2016) / Iran “quasi-experimental N=168” The Trans theoretical Model 45-minute sessions educational program about BSE. In the intervention group subscale of TTM (self-efficacy, stages of change, decisional balance) significantly higher than CON. Moderate
Lin and Judith (2010)/ Taiwan “pretest–posttest design/ N=128 (64 in each group)” The Trans theoretical Model The tailored intervention group received a feedback, personal testimonies, and role modeling/The standard intervention group received mammography brochures. after intervention the tailored intervention group had significantly more positive perceptions of mammography and more intention to have mammography than the standard intervention group Moderate
Lin & Wang (2009)/ “pretest–posttest design/ N=185” The Trans theoretical Model “1.Complete tailored intervention(N= 61): education activity, utilizing a personal testimony activity, and an environmental reevaluation technique 2.Tailored message intervention(N = 6 3)received computer-generated messages 3.Standard intervention(N = 61): received educational brochures” The result showing CTI earned a higher mean (60.56) post intervention score than that of both TMI (57.95) and SI (53.26). Moderate
Mirzaii et al, (2016)/ Iran “randomized quasi-experimental N=120” SHEP model SHEP-based educational intervention was implemented in the form of workshops and two four-hour sessions (total: 8 h) After the intervention, in the experimental group women had significantly higher attitude scores relative to the CON. Also in the experimental group significant increase was seen in the BSE scores. Moderate
Goel et al, (2016)/ United States “Pretest-post test N=97” social cognitive theory intervention group viewed a brief video “In the intervention group the proportion of mammogram referrals Were significantly higher than CON” Moderate