Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 27;9:00950. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00950

Table 2.

Patients’ treatment and outcome according to histology (Per Protocol population n = 27).

Other malignant CNS tumor
Ependymoma (n = 8) High grade glioma (n = 5) Low grade glioma (n = 10) Other (n = 4) Total (n = 19)
Tumor status
     Refractory tumors 3 (60%) 5 (50%) 1 (25%) 9 (47%)
     Relapse 5 (63%) 1 (20%) 1 (25%) 2 (11%)
     Refractory relapse 3 (37%) 1 (20%) 5 (50%) 2 (50%) 8 (42%)
Number of cycle of treatment received 1.8 [1.3–2.0] 0.5 [0.5–1.5] 6.8 [2.0–11.0] 1.0 [0.8–1.3] 2.0 [0.5–9.0]
Response after 2 cycles of treatment
     Without progression 1 (13%) 1 (20%) 8 (80%) 9 (48%)
     Progression 7 (87%) 4 (80%) 2 (20%) 4 (100%) 10 (52%)
“Best response” after any nr of cycle
     CR or PR 2 (20%) 2 (10%)
     Stable 1 (13%) 1 (20%) 6 (60%) 7 (37%)
     Progression 7 (87%) 4 (80%) 2 (20%) 4 (100%) 10 (53%)
Median of PFS (days) 109 48 70.0 105

Data are median [range] and n(%) of patients. nr, number; PFS, progression-free survival. Median PFS was not attained for LGG. Eleven patients with LGG included with one patient not assessable at two cycles.