Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 3;6(3):413–424. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068

TABLE 2.

Two-Sample t Test Results Comparing Likeliness to Recommend Services of Client Groups

Client Group No. Mean Standard Deviation T-Value Calculator T Critical Values Degrees of Freedom P Value
India (N=188)
Implementation Approach
Interview 92 9.52 1.09 3.11 2.61 131 .002
Drop box 96 8.69 5.75
Scale Type
Numerical scale 95 8.94 4.00 1.16 2.60 185 .25
Emoji scale 93 9.26 3.24
Kenya and Nigeria (N=590)
Age Cohort
Adult clients 472 8.54 1.56 4.20 1.97 202 <.001
Youth clients 118 8.06 1.18
Clinic Type
Outreach clinics 306 8.47 1.06 0.53 1.96 513 .60
Static clinics 284 8.42 2.03
Method Type
Short-acting method 383 8.53 1.42 2.24 1.96 587 .03
Long-acting method 206 8.29 1.70
Insertion vs. Removal
IUD/implant insertion 205 8.29 1.71 2.43 1.97 178 .02
IUD/implant removal 69 7.96 0.75
El Salvador (N=226)
Age Cohort
Adult clients 177 9.38 1.27 0.86 2.00 62 .40
Youth clients 48 9.58 2.25

Abbreviation: IUD, intrauterine device.

Notes: Adult clients were ages 25 and older; youth were under age 25.