Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 15;305:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.04.021

Table 3.

Pearson's correlation coefficient between the rating of random resections and their overlap with the corresponding actual resection.

Patient Class CC SC CC FN
1 I 0.29 0.94
2 I 0.20 0.91
3 I −0.07 0.33
4 I 0.59 0.76
5 I 0.60 −0.25
6 I 0.61 0.94
7 I 0.22 0.89
8 I 0.75 0.93
9 I 0.39 0.58
10 I 0.32 0.71
11 I 0.59 0.93
12 I −0.02 0.97
13 I −0.18 0.76
14 IV −0.16 −0.02
15 IV 0.55 0.94
16 IV −0.23 −0.40
17 IV −0.41 0.46
18 IV 0.04 0.31
19 IV 0.59 0.64
20 IV 0.07 −0.14

Classes have significantly different means in both, the soft clustering approach (p = 0.0403) and the functional network approach (p = 0.0051).