Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 9;1(1):bjgpopen17X100689. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen17X100689

Table 5. Pattern of physical examination of GP(-residents) facing a patient with peripheral SpA in round 1 and 2.

Item checked by GP or GP-resident Educational group (n = 19) Control group (= 40)
Round 1 Round 2 Change score Round 1 Round 2 Change score
Range of motion affected finger or toe 12 (63) 10 (53) –2 (–11) 22 (55) 14 (35) –8 (–20)
Range of motion wrist or ankle of affected limb 1 (5) 3 (16) 2 (11) 2 (5) 1 (3) –1 (–2)
Physical examination on both hands or feet 6 (32) 6 (32) 0 (0) 12 (30) 6 (15) –6 (–15)
Palpation joints hands or feet 16 (84) 11 (58) –5 (–26) 23 (58) 26 (65) 3 (8)
Palpation MCP or MTP joint affected finger or toe 14 (74) 11 (58) –3 (–16) 16 (40) 22 (55) 6 (15)
Palpation other MCP or MTP joints 5 (26) 6 (32) 1 (5) 9 (23) 10 (25) 1 (2)
Palpation PIP joint affected finger or toe 13 (68) 11 (58) –2 (–10) 22 (55) 24 (60) 2 (5)
Palpation other PIP joints 4 (21) 3 (16) –1 (–5) 8 (20) 9 (23) 1 (2)
Palpation DIP joint affected finger or toe 14 (74) 11 (58) –3 (–16) 21 (53) 22 (55) 1 (2)
Palpation other DIP joints 5 (26) 3 (16) –2 (–10) 6 (15) 7 (17) 1 (2)
Physical examination hands (in case of dactylitis foot) and vice versa 0 (0) 4 (21) 4 (21) 1 (3) 3 (8) 2 (5)
Physical examination Achilles tendons 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (8) 3 (8)
Physical examination other joints 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (5) 2 (5)

The values are expressed as number (percentage) of GP(-residents). Numbers may not add up due to rounding. MCP = metacarpophalangeal. MTP = metatarsophalangeal. PIP = proximal interphalangeal.