Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;9:739–751. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S169740

Table S1.

Evaluation of teaching performance

Group Instructor Mean rank of evaluation item
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Solo Clinician X 83.09 98.20 99.73 87.23 88.48 97.64 84.59
Clinician Y 91.21 79.39 83.04 92.79 95.07 92.29 98.05
Clinician Z 91.21 79.39 83.04 92.79 95.07 92.29 98.05
Scientist A 114.34 118.54 121.50 115.39 120.73 120.55 111.54
Scientist B 120.66 117.84 110.08 123.21 121.13 106.52 117.84
Co Co-teacher A 104.69 105.61 104.19 101.34 96.26 106.15 105.23
Co-teacher W 112.68 118.50 117.03 105.95 103.03 104.68 103.79
MW Co vs. Solo 4080.50 3871.50 3961.00 4393.00 4225.00 4283.50 4339.5
Three groups 11.50*b 14.63*b,c 10.08*b 10.53*b 9.96*b 4.61 5.70
Overall 12.50 17.69** 13.31** 11.20 10.49 5.83 7.13

Notes: MW, Mann–Whitney U-test for co-teaching vs. solo-teaching comparison. χ2 =Kruskal–Wallis test for overall comparisons. Post hoc Mann–Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction was conducted revealing that no instructor-by-instructor comparisons were significantly different.

*

p<0.05.

**

p<0.05.

a

Post hoc: scientist vs. co-teaching comparison, adjusted p<0.05 in pair-wise MW.

b

Post hoc: scientist vs. clinician comparison, adjusted p<0.05 in pair-wise MW.

c

Post hoc: clinician vs. co-teaching comparison, adjusted p<0.05 in pair-wise MW.