Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 5;8:14894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32424-z

Table 1.

Generalized linear model: error vs. screw location and navigation method.

Clinical Variables Screw Location and Error Median (95 percentile) Navigation Method Median (95 percentile)
Cervical N = 9 Thoracic N = 225 Lumbar N = 130 Sacral N = 6 P-Value Benchmark N = 209 Experimental N = 162 P-Value
Axial Distance Error (mm) 1.00 (1.73) 1.05 (3.69) 1.53 (3.94) 1.03 (1.93) 0.381 1.14 (3.92) 1.21 (3.42) 0.597
Axial Angle Error (deg) 2.79 (4.33) 2.07 (8.07) 2.48 (9.47) 6.05 (11.59)* 0.009* 2.43 (8.97) 2.15 (8.14) 0.839
Sagittal Distance Error (mm) 1.32 (2.20) 0.86 (1.28) 1.28 (4.12) 0.84 (2.13) 0.437 0.83 (3.62) 1.13 (4.25) 0.214
Sagittal Angle Error (deg) 1.55 (4.22) 2.57 (9.75) 2.47 (9.48) 3.86 (10.77) 0.485 2.60 (10.06) 2.33 (8.59) 0.492

Statistical analysis using generalized linear model of axial distance, axial angle error, sagittal distance error, and sagittal angle error as a function of screw location (cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral) and navigation method (benchmark navigation, experimental navigation). No significant differences were seen using the experimental navigation system. Screws located in the sacrum demonstrated increased axial angle error vs. thoracic and lumbar spine.