Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 5;50:48. doi: 10.1186/s12711-018-0405-y

Table 3.

Identity, position, and effects of significantly associated dominance SNPs obtained by single SNP regression mixed model for birth weight (BWT), weaning weight (WWT), pre-weaning daily gain (PDG), yearling weight (YWT) and marbling score (MBS) in beef cattle

Traits Groups SNP reference BTA Position MAF p value FDR (%) Allele substitution effects Dominance effects Genes Region
BWT (kg) C rs110704582 1 113,215,525 0.327 4.60e−07 5 0.404 − 0.942 U6atac Intergenic
C rs41596755 6 55,697,300 0.244 3.91e−06 10 0.552 1.012 Intergenic
WWT (kg) P rs42779004 21 36,186,103 0.196 2.74e−07 5 − 4.016 6.994 bta-mir-2888-1 Intergenic
A rs29027109 3 98,222,548 0.387 2.64e−07 5 − 0.361 2.610 AGBL4 Intron
PDG (kg/d) P rs42779004 21 36,186,103 0.196 1.89e−06 10 − 0.019 0.037 bta-mir-2888-1 Intergenic
A rs29027109 3 98,222,548 0.387 2.29e−06 10 − 0.001 0.016 AGBL4 Intron
YWT (kg) C rs109808526 4 113,614,764 0.318 1.18e−06 10 − 1.562 6.316 REPIN1 Intergenic
MBS A rs110361335 4 17,230,513 0.182 6.47e−07 5 8.317 13.88 ICA1 Intron
A rs110564527 4 17,657,399 0.207 1.20e−07 5 − 8.023 15.37 NXPH1 Intergenic

P = purebred sample included individuals with > 80% of Angus, Hereford and Charolais (n = 1467); C = crossbred sample included Kinsella composite, Beefbooster TX composite (www.beefbooster.com) and two and more way crosses involving Angus, Hereford, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Simmental, Limousin, and Piedmontese breeds (n = 5327); A = combined data of all individuals in the study (n = 6794)