Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 6;17:91. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0395-1

Table 3.

Associations in the Inter99 study between PRAL score and diabetes-related intermediary traits stratified by sex as well as means and medians for the individual quintiles

Variable Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 BetaModel 1 (95%CI) P Model 1 P Model 2
Men n = 558 n = 558 n = 557 n = 558 n = 558
PRAL range (mEq/d) − 92; −11 −11; −1 −1; 6 6; 15 15; 90
HBA1C (%)a 6.0 ± 0.6 5.9 ± 0.6 5.9 ± 0.4 5.9 ± 0.7 5.9 ± 0.6 − 0.001 (− 0.003; 6 × 10− 5) 0.06 0.04
Plasma glucose (mmol/l)
 Fastinga 5.8 ± 1.0 5.7 ± 0.9 5.7 ± 0.7 5.7 ± 1.1 5.6 ± 0.9 − 0.001 (− 0.004; 0.0008) 0.2 0.1
 30 mina 9.5 ± 2.1 9.1 ± 1.9 9.2 ± 1.8 9.2 ± 1.8 9.0 ± 1.8 −0.003 (− 0.007; 0.001) 0.2 0.09
 120 min 5.6 (4.6; 7.0) 5.9 (4.9; 6.9) 5.9 (4.8; 6.9) 5.7 (4.8; 6.79) 5.9 (4.9; 7.0) 0.2 (0.1; 0.3) 3 × 10− 6 6 × 10− 6
Serum insulin (pmol/l)
 Fasting 34 (23; 52) 36 (24; 54) 38 (25; 56) 37 (25; 57) 37 (25; 55) 0.2 (0.02; 0.3) 0.02 0.052
 30 min 244 (170; 356) 251 (165; 368) 255 (181; 380) 253 (173; 382) 264 (185; 396) 0.06 (−0.08; 0.2) 0.4 0.9
 120 min 123 (67; 223) 141 (82; 233) 155 (83; 255) 143 (81; 242) 150 (89; 275) 0.6 (0.4; 0.8) 4 × 10−9 5 × 10−9
Measures of beta cell function
 Insulinogenic index 22.5 (15.0; 34.0) 23.5 (15.2; 34.9) 23.8 (16.2; 35.5) 23.1 (15.5; 36.3) 25.6 (16.6; 38.8) 0.08 (−0.09; 0.2) 0.3 0.6
 Corrected insulin response 511 (306; 820) 557 (358; 932) 564 (353; 968) 563 (360; 891) 655 (384; 1008) 0.1 (−0.04; 0.3) 0.1 0.2
Measures of insulin sensitivity
 HOMA-IR 1.5 (0.9; 2.3) 1.5 (1.0; 2.3) 1.6 (1.0; 2.4) 1.6 (1.0; 2.4) 1.5 (1.0; 2.4) 0.1 (−0.02; 0.3) 0.09 0.2
 ISIMatsuda 7.7 (4.9; 11.5) 7.3 (4.9; 11.1) 7.2 (4.8; 10.6) 7.1 (5.0; 11.0) 7.4 (4.6; 10.6) −0.2 (−0.3; − 0.03) 0.02 0.04
 BIGTT-Sia 8.3 ± 3.6 8.1 ± 3.5 8.0 ± 3.4 8.1 ± 3.5 8.1 ± 3.6 −0.02 (− 0.02; − 0.007) 3 × 10−4 3 × 10−4
Disposition Index 285 (188; 407) 273 (185; 390) 277 (188; 381) 282 (186; 382) 302 (197; 419) −0.1 (− 0.3; 0.05) 0.2 0.3
Women n = 569 n = 568 n = 568 n = 568 n = 569
PRAL range (mEq/d) −84; −15 −15; −5 −5; 1 1; 9 9; 77
HBA1C (%)a 5.8 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 0.4 5.7 ± 0.4 5.7 ± 0.5 5.7 ± 0.5 −0.0002 (−0.001; 0.0009) 0.7 0.3
Plasma glucose (mmol/l)
 Fastinga 5.4 ± 0.7 5.3 ± 0.5 5.3 ± 0.5 5.3 ± 0.6 5.3 ± 0.9 0.001 (−0.0005; 0.003) 0.2 0.4
 30 mina 8.1 ± 1.8 8.2 ± 1.7 8.1 ± 1.7 8.1 ± 1.8 8.2 ± 1.7 0.003 (− 0.002; 0.007) 0.3 0.8
 120 min 5.7 (4.9; 6.7) 5.9 (4.9; 6.9) 6.0 (5.2; 6.9) 6.0 (5.1; 7.0) 6.0 (5.2; 7.1) 0.2 (0.08; 0.2) 3 × 10−5 7 × 10−4
Serum insulin (pmol/l)
 Fasting 31 (22; 46) 30 (22; 44) 34 (23; 51) 34 (24; 47) 33 (24; 50) 0.3 (0.1; 0.4) 8 × 10−4 0.03
 30 min 238 (171; 325) 228 (168; 322) 238 (178; 324) 243 (179; 348) 253 (185; 347) 0.1 (−0.02; 0.3) 0.08 0.5
 120 min 155 (104; 230) 162 (113; 246) 175 (114; 259) 178 (119; 277) 185 (123; 275) 0.5 (0.4; 0.7) 1 × 10−8 1 × 10−6
Measures of beta cell function
 Insulinogenic index 25.3 (17.6; 37.4) 24.4 (17.3; 34.4) 24.7 (17.8; 35.9) 26.0 (18.4; 39.5) 27.1 (18.6; 38.7) 0.07 (−0.09; 0.2) 0.4 0.8
 Corrected insulin response 736 (483; 1224) 693 (454; 1131) 762 (456; 1223) 775 (494; 1278) 827 (488; 1352) 0.05 (−0.2; 0.3) 0.6 0.7
Measures of insulin sensitivity
 HOMA-IR 1.2 (0.84; 1.8) 1.2 (0.85; 1.8) 1.3 (0.89; 2.0) 1.3 (0.94; 1.9) 1.3 (0.91; 2.0) 0.3 (0.1; 0.4) 8 × 10−4 0.04
 ISIMatsuda 8.8 (6.1; 12.1) 8.7 (6.0; 12.3) 8.2 (5.4; 11.7) 8.0 (5.7; 10.9) 7.9 (5.5; 11.0) −0.3 (−0.5; −0.2) 2 × 10−5 0.002
 BIGTT-Sia 10.7 ± 4.2 10.6 ± 4.1 10.3 ± 4.4 10.3 ± 4.1 10.0 ± 4.3 −0.03 (− 0.04; − 0.02) 8 × 10−6 8 × 10−6
Disposition Index 324 (225; 474) 316 (217; 434) 308 (204; 425) 312 (227; 431) 324 (223; 428) −0.2 (− 0.4; − 0.08) 0.003 0.02

Data are from the Inter99 cohort and presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (inter quartile range) for each quintile of PRAL score as a description of the cohorts. Effect sizes (95% confidence interval) are calculated using linear models with PRAL score as a continuous variable and are given as percentage increase for a one unit increase in PRAL score except for variables that have not been transformed by the natural logarithm in which case it is given as an increase per unit. The linear regression model 1 was adjusted for age, smoking, physical activity and fat, energy and carbohydrate intake. The linear regression model 2 was adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, physical activity and fat, energy and carbohydrate intake except for BIGTT-Si, which was not adjusted for BMI (as this variable is included in the calculation of BIGTT-Si). Calculations of measures of beta cell function and insulin sensitivity were carried out as described in methods. Variables were transformed by the natural logarithm unless otherwise indicated by (a). Quintile values are raw data and are for descriptive purposes only