Table A4.

Results of the moderation effects of job autonomy^a.

	Outcome variable: meaningful worka				Outcome variable: employee IWBb
	Coefficients	SE	t	95% CI	Coefficients	SE	t	95% CI
Control variables
Gender	0.01	0.05	-0.22	[-0.13,0.10]	-0.21∗∗∗	0.06	-0.70	[-0.32, -0.10]
Age	0.01	0.01	1.03	[-0.01,0.02]	-0.00	0.01	-0.31	[-0.01,0.01]
Education	-0.06	0.04	-1.55	[-0.13,0.02]	0.03	0.04	0.88	[-0.04,0.10]
Organizational tenure	-0.02∗	0.01	-2.23	[-0.04,-0.00]	0.02	0.01	1.76	[-0.00,0.04]
Independent variable
Servant leadership	-0.20	0.21	-0.97	[-0.61,0.21]	-0.04	0.05	-0.79	[-0.13,0.06]
Mediator
Meaningful work					0.49∗∗∗	0.06	8.89	[0.38,0.60]
					-0.21∗∗∗	0.06	-0.70	[-0.32,-0.10]
Interactive effect					-0.00	0.01	-0.31	[-0.01,0.01]
Servant leadership × job autonomy	0.12∗	0.06	2.45	[0.02,0.22]
Model summary c	R	R2	MSE	F	R	R2	MSE	F
	0.53	0.28	0.23	15.41	0.53	0.28	0.22	18.00

N = 288, ^∗p < 0.05, ^∗∗p < 0.01, and ^∗∗∗p < 0.001 ^aAll statistics were performed using PROCESS (Model 1) in SPSS. ^bAll statistics were performed using PROCESS (Model 7) in SPSS. ^cAll findings in the model(s) summary are significant (p < 0.001).