Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;363:k3965. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3965

Table 3.

Primary and secondary endpoints for participants allocated to laparoscopic cholecystectomy or percutaneous catheter drainage. Values are numbers (percentages) unless stated otherwise

Outcomes Cholecystectomy group (n=66) Drainage group (n=68) Risk ratio (95% CI) P value
Primary endpoints*
Death 2 (3) 6 (9) 0.34 (0.07 to 1.64) 0.27
Major complications† 8 (12) 44 (65) 0.19 (0.10 to 0.37) <0.001
Secondary endpoints*
Death: 2 (3) 6 (9) 0.34 (0.07 to 1.64) 0.27
 Directly/indirectly related to acute cholecystitis 0 3 (4)
 Unrelated to acute cholecystitis 2 (3) 2 (3)
 Unknown cause 0 1 (2)
Infectious and cardiopulmonary complication‡: 5 (8) 3 (4) 0.97 (0.89 to 1.05) 0.49
 Intra-abdominal abscess 4 (6) 2 (3)
 Pneumonia 2 (3) 1 (2)
 Myocardial infarction 0 0
 Pulmonary embolism 0 0
Need for reintervention‡: 8 (12) 45 (66) 0.18 (0.09 to 0.36) <0.001
 Surgical intervention 3 (5) 32 (47) 0.10 (0.03 to 0.30) <0.001
  Emergency cholecystectomy NA 11 (16)
   Clinical deterioration NA 2 (3)
   Recurrent cholecystitis NA 9 (13)
  Elective cholecystectomy§ 2 (2) 20 (29)
   Recurrent gallstone related disease NA 15 (22)
   Dysfunctional drain¶ NA 1 (2)
   Absence of duodenal backflow revealed by cholangiography¶ NA 4 (6)
   Cholecystectomy not performed during index admission¶ 2 (2) NA
  Diagnostic laparoscopy 1 (2) 1 (2)
 Endoscopic intervention 6 (9) 11 (16) 0.56 (0.22 to 1.43) 0.22
  ERCP 6 (9) 11 (16)
   Choledocholithiasis 2 (3) 9 (13)
   Biliary injury 4 (6) 2 (3)
   Removal of biliary stent 1 (2) 0
 Radiological intervention 4 (6) 15 (22) 0.28 (0.10 to 0.79) 0.008
  Percutaneous catheter drainage NA 8 (12)
   Recurrent cholecystitis NA 6 (9)
   Dysfunctional drain NA 2 (3)
  Drainage abscess 3 (5) 4 (6)
  Drainage biloma 2 (3) 0
  Drainage ascites 0 1 (2)
  Antegrade cholangiography NA 4 (6)
  Contrast image PTC tube 1 (2) 0
Recurrent biliary disease‡: 3 (5) 36 (53) 0.09 (0.03 to 0.27) <0.001
 Requiring emergency readmission 3 (5) 28 (41)
 Requiring planned readmission 2 (3) 16 (24)
  Elective cholecystectomy NA 15 (22)
  ERCP 2 (3) 3 (4)
Minor complication: 0 4 (6) 0.12
 Wound infection 0 2 (3)
 Bleeding 0 0
 Urinary tract infection 0 2 (3)
Healthcare utilisation:
Median (interquartile range) length of stay after randomisation (days) 4 (3-6) 6 (4-8) 0.01
Median (interquartile range) total length of hospital stay (days) 5 (4-8) 9 (6-19) <0.001
Median (interquartile range) total length of stay in ICU (days) 0 (0-0) 0 (0-0) 0.16
Total No (range per patient) of ER visits per study group 7 (0-1) 56 (0-5) <0.001
Total No (range per patient) of reinterventions per study group 21 (0-6) 64 (0-4) <0.001
Total No (range per patient) of readmissions per study group 9 (0-2) 67 (0-5) <0.001

ERCP=endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; PTC=percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography; ICU=intensive care unit; ER=emergency department; NA=not applicable.

*

Multiple events in same patient were considered as one endpoint.

For example, infectious and cardiopulmonary complications within one month, need for reintervention within one year, or recurrent biliary disease within one year.

Included in primary endpoint of major complications.

§

Elective cholecystectomies were not included in primary endpoint, unless performed for recurrent gallstone related disease.

These procedures were not included in primary endpoint because the adjudication committee judged the indication debatable.