. 2016 Jul 8;4(2):237–244. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12391

Table 4.

MDS PD‐MCI Level II neuropsychological battery discriminative validity in PD‐MCI vs. PD‐ND based on normative data comparisons (NS; N = 699) in the Czech population

	Below –2.0 SDs	Below –1.5 SDs
	d	d
1. Attention and working memory
TMT‐A	0.56^a	0.70^a
DS backward	0.66^a	0.64^a
2. Executive function
TMT‐B	0.83^a	0.89^a
PST‐C	0.57^a	0.59^a
3. Language
Semantic fluency	0.77^a	0.66^a
WAIS‐R Sim	1.06^a	0.81^a
4. Memory
RAVLT‐DR	0.59^a	0.67^a
WMS‐III FP‐DR	0.42^a	0.60^a
5. Visuospatial functions
JoL	0.85^a	0.62^a
CLOX‐I	0.26^a	0.30^a
Composite score	1.12^a	1.14^a

d = Cohen᾽s effect size coefficient. MDS PD‐MCI battery domains, raw scores for the neuropsychological tests are provided. 2. Executive function = Letter fluency (N + K + P).

^a P < 0.05.

PST‐C, Prague Stroop Test Interference Score; Semantic fluency (animals+ clothes + shopping); WAIS‐R Sim, Similarities; RAVLT‐DR, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall; WMS‐III FP‐DR, Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Revision Family Pictures Delayed Recall; JoL, Judgment of Line Orientation; CLOX‐I, Royall's CLOX