Table 2.
Descriptive statistics and correlations of the examined variables (Study 3)
Range | Mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. TUMS love motivation | 1–7 | 3.02 (1.62) | – | ||||||
2. TUMS sex motivation | 1–7 | 2.53 (1.41) | −0.19** | – | |||||
3. TUMS self-esteem enhancement motivation | 1–7 | 2.13 (1.37) | 0.32** | 0.12* | – | ||||
4. TUMS boredom motivation | 1–7 | 3.82 (1.74) | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.16** | – | |||
5. Problematic Tinder Use Scale | 1–5 | 1.69 (0.56) | 0.33** | 0.20** | 0.55** | 0.26** | – | ||
6. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale | 0–3 | 1.82 (0.65) | −0.07 | 0.17** | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.10 | – | |
7. BPNSFS Relatedness Satisfaction Scale | 1–5 | 3.97 (0.83) | 0.02 | −0.06 | −0.15* | −0.02 | −0.19** | 0.42** | – |
8. BPNSFS Relatedness Frustration Scale | 1–5 | 1.92 (0.83) | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.27** | 0.04 | 0.29** | −0.50** | −0.67** |
Note. TUMS: Tinder Use Motivation Scale; BPNSFS: Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration Scale; SD: standard deviation.
*p < .05. **p < .01.