Table 1.
Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics between male and female veterans and non-veterans
| Males | p | Females | p | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-veterans (n = 420) | Veterans (n = 210) | Non-veterans (n = 94) | Veterans (n = 47) | |||||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||||||||
| 16–24 | 10 | 3.70 | 5 | 4.36 | .773 | .959 | 8 | 11.99 | 4 | 17.20 | .540 | .894 |
| 25–34 | 42 | 12.22 | 21 | 13.80 | .642 | 12 | 13.87 | 6 | 11.82 | .747 | ||
| 35–44 | 118 | 29.58 | 59 | 27.21 | .539 | 20 | 21.73 | 10 | 18.36 | .642 | ||
| 45–54 | 96 | 24.63 | 48 | 24.28 | .929 | 24 | 24.52 | 12 | 28.19 | .647 | ||
| 55–64 | 154 | 29.87 | 77 | 30.35 | .902 | 30 | 27.89 | 15 | 24.42 | .662 | ||
| Ethnicity | ||||||||||||
| White | 387 | 89.6 | 200 | 94.5 | .076 | .087 | 87 | 91.4 | 44 | 85.8 | .525 | .479 |
| Non-white | 32 | 10.5 | 10 | 5.5 | .088 | 6 | 8.6 | 3 | 14.2 | .474 | ||
| Marital status | ||||||||||||
| Single | 80 | 17.16 | 24 | 10.65 | .070 | .105 | 19 | 22.31 | 7 | 17.36 | .588 | .221 |
| Married/cohabiting | 272 | 72.28 | 150 | 79.59 | .049* | 62 | 70.42 | 26 | 65.38 | .599 | ||
| Widowed/divorced/ separated | 68 | 10.56 | 36 | 9.76 | .728 | 13 | 7.27 | 14 | 17.25 | .027* | ||
| Household size | ||||||||||||
| One adult aged 16–59, no children | 86 | 12.14 | 30 | 7.74 | .037* | .083 | 14 | 8.45 | 12 | 19.60 | .055 | .119 |
| Two adults, both aged 16–59, no children | 102 | 26.75 | 52 | 27.13 | .916 | 24 | 26.63 | 13 | 30.02 | .699 | ||
| Small family | 60 | 15.34 | 48 | 23.46 | .022* | 18 | 17.33 | 7 | 14.31 | .660 | ||
| Large family | 22 | 6.78 | 12 | 8.42 | .554 | 2 | 1.71 | 3 | 7.23 | .092 | ||
| Large adult household | 66 | 24.41 | 23 | 17.54 | .107 | 19 | 31.88 | 5 | 18.69 | .206 | ||
| Two adults, one or both aged 60+, no children | 62 | 12.30 | 31 | 12.39 | .972 | 14 | 12.60 | 3 | 5.97 | .216 | ||
| One adult, aged 60+, no children | 22 | 2.28 | 14 | 3.32 | .266 | 3 | 1.39 | 4 | 4.18 | .131 | ||
Note. Percentages are weighted to account for complex survey design; case numbers are unweighted and may not therefore sum due to missing values. p: the significance of Pearson’s χ2 test with second-order Rao and Scott’s correction for survey design.
Significant result where p < .05.