Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;7(2):355–365. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.25

Table 2.

Comparison of gambling-related outcomes between non-veterans and veterans and between armed forces service early leaver veterans and veterans with more than 4 years experience

n % n % p OR [95% CI]
Non-veterans (n = 514) Veterans (n = 257)
DSM-IV gambling score
 0 (no risk) 456 96.01 233 96.39 .822 .112 1.11 [0.45–2.75]
 1–2 (at-risk) 18 3.54 6 2.21 .375 0.61 [0.21–1.82]
 3–4 (problem gambler) 1 0.17 3 1.41 .036* 8.17 [0.79–84.05]
 5+ (pathological gambler) 2 0.03 0 0 .337 n/a
>4 years service (n = 142) <4 years service (n = 114)
DSM-IV gambling score
 0 129 96.21 103 96.56 .899 .954 1.10 [0.23–5.19]
 1–2 (at-risk) 5 2.49 1 1.88 .790 0.75 [0.09–6.38]
 3–4 (problem gambler) 1 1.29 2 1.56 .880 1.21 [0.10–14.83]
 5+ (pathological gambler) 0 0 0 0 n/a

Note. Percentages are weighted to account for complex survey design; case numbers are unweighted and may not therefore sum due to missing values. p: the significance of Pearson’s χ2 test with second-order Rao and Scott’s correction for survey design; OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: confidence interval at 95%.

*

Significant result where p < .05.