Table 2.
Comparison of gambling-related outcomes between non-veterans and veterans and between armed forces service early leaver veterans and veterans with more than 4 years experience
| n | % | n | % | p | OR [95% CI] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-veterans (n = 514) | Veterans (n = 257) | ||||||
| DSM-IV gambling score | |||||||
| 0 (no risk) | 456 | 96.01 | 233 | 96.39 | .822 | .112 | 1.11 [0.45–2.75] |
| 1–2 (at-risk) | 18 | 3.54 | 6 | 2.21 | .375 | 0.61 [0.21–1.82] | |
| 3–4 (problem gambler) | 1 | 0.17 | 3 | 1.41 | .036* | 8.17 [0.79–84.05] | |
| 5+ (pathological gambler) | 2 | 0.03 | 0 | 0 | .337 | n/a | |
| >4 years service (n = 142) | <4 years service (n = 114) | ||||||
| DSM-IV gambling score | |||||||
| 0 | 129 | 96.21 | 103 | 96.56 | .899 | .954 | 1.10 [0.23–5.19] |
| 1–2 (at-risk) | 5 | 2.49 | 1 | 1.88 | .790 | 0.75 [0.09–6.38] | |
| 3–4 (problem gambler) | 1 | 1.29 | 2 | 1.56 | .880 | 1.21 [0.10–14.83] | |
| 5+ (pathological gambler) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | n/a | |
Note. Percentages are weighted to account for complex survey design; case numbers are unweighted and may not therefore sum due to missing values. p: the significance of Pearson’s χ2 test with second-order Rao and Scott’s correction for survey design; OR: odds ratio; 95%CI: confidence interval at 95%.
Significant result where p < .05.