Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2018 Jul 17;180:265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.021

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

In vitro cell uptake of nanoparticles and their cold responsiveness inside cells. Confocal micrographs of (A) 2D cancer cells and (B) 3D mammosphere cells after incubating with HCPN-CG nanoparticles for 3 h at 37 °C, followed by cooling on ice (+I, 5 min), laser irradiation (+L, 1 W/cm2, 2 min), or both (+I+L). The cells incubated with HCPN-CG nanoparticles and further treated with ice cooling and laser irradiation (HCPN-CG+I+L) appear shrunken and/or spiky. (C) TEM images of cancer cells treated with saline, HCPN-CG nanoparticles alone, and HCPN-CG nanoparticles with ice cooling for 5 min (+I, 5 min), NIR laser irradiation for 2 min at 1 W/cm2 (+L, 1 W/cm2, 2 min), or both (+I+L). Endo/lysosomes can be easily observed as white dots in the low-magnification images (top row) in HCPN-CG treated cells (no such white dots in control cells treated with saline), due to the uptake of multiple HCPN-CG nanoparticles with a core-shell structure (Figure 2A) in the endo/lysosomes of the cells (bottom row). Importantly, almost all the nanoparticles disappeared/disassembled in the endo/lysosomes after ice cooling, but not NIR irradiation alone. The insets in the high-magnification images in the bottom row show endo/lysosomes either with intact HCPN-CG nanoparticles or without discernable nanoparticles (due to their disassembly upon ice cooling, +I). DIC: differential interference contrast.