Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2009 Oct 22;11(4):330–342. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.08.004

Table 2.

Effect Sizes and Necessary Sample Sizes for Normally Menstruating Women and Oral-Contraceptive Women to Reach Significance at the .01 Level for Menstrual Cycle Phase Contrasts Are Presented for Mean Response Criterion, B, and Mean Discriminitability, P(A). Target Power for the Sample Size Calculation Was 80%

Phase Contrasts Normally Menstruating Women
Oral Contraceptive Women
Response Criterion, B
Discriminability P(A)
Response Criterion, B
Discriminability P(A)
Effect
Size
Sample
Size Needed
Effect
Size
Sample
Size Needed
Effect
Size
Sample
Size Needed
Effect
Size
Sample
Size Needed
Menstrual vs follicular .399 75 .063 2,935 .319 116 n/a n/a
Menstrual vs ovulatory .024 20,185 .099 1,204 .389 78 n/a n/a
Menstrual vs luteal .154 495 .380 82 .209 270 .114 897
Menstrual vs late luteal .292 138 n/a n/a .432 64 .088 1,521
Follicular vs ovulatory .325 112 .025 19,032 .207 274 n/a n/a
Follicular vs luteal .122 787 .150 519 .175 384 .219 246
Follicular vs late luteal .035 9,707 .073 2,198 .159 464 .085 1,612
Ovulatory vs luteal .185 342 .184 348 .340 102 .142 585
Ovulatory vs late luteal .322 114 .141 590 .271 160 .067 2,613
Luteal vs late luteal .207 273 .366 88 n/a n/a .053 4,220