Table 5.
Classification outcomes of each individual classifier for females.
| Features | SVM | GMM | LR | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sen. (%) | Spe. (%) | Acc. (%) | Sen. (%) | Spe. (%) | Acc. (%) | Sen. (%) | Spe. (%) | Acc. (%) | |
| MFCC | 63.24 | 57.27 | 60.31 | 56.47 | 66.06 | 61.17 | 62.79 | 61.80 | 62.30 |
| PROS | 67.21 | 60.65 | 63.99 | 51.72 | 73.29 | 62.30 | 64.35 | 66.73 | 65.52 |
| SPEC | 60.64 | 63.35 | 61.97 | 52.44 | 73.70 | 62.87 | 63.05 | 64.91 | 63.96 |
| GLOT | 56.60 | 42.53 | 49.70 | 51.33 | 50.44 | 50.90 | 52.70 | 46.11 | 49.47 |
| MFCC + PROS | 67.53 | 61.06 | 64.36 | 56.86 | 71.54 | 64.06 | 64.93 | 66.06 | 65.48 |
| MFCC + SPEC | 66.10 | 61.60 | 63.89 | 57.78 | 69.78 | 63.66 | 63.24 | 65.99 | 64.59 |
| MFCC + GLOT | 63.05 | 57.20 | 60.18 | 55.63 | 64.84 | 60.15 | 62.66 | 60.24 | 61.47 |
| PROS + SPEC | 64.09 | 64.50 | 64.29 | 51.01 | 73.83 | 62.20 | 63.63 | 67.61 | 65.58 |
| PROS + GLOT | 67.47 | 59.16 | 63.40 | 52.31 | 72.08 | 62.00 | 63.37 | 66.73 | 65.02 |
| SPEC + GLOT | 61.09 | 60.31 | 60.71 | 51.79 | 70.99 | 61.21 | 61.87 | 62.75 | 62.30 |
| MFCC + PROS + SPEC | 64.74 | 62.41 | 63.59 | 56.47 | 73.09 | 64.62 | 64.41 | 67.41 | 65.88 |
| MFCC + PROS + GLOT | 67.08 | 62.27 | 64.72 | 55.50 | 72.62 | 63.89 | 64.74 | 67.14 | 65.92 |
| MFCC + SPEC + GLOT | 63.37 | 62.68 | 63.03 | 57.71 | 69.37 | 63.43 | 62.39 | 63.42 | 62.90 |
| PROS + SPEC + GLOT | 64.15 | 63.42 | 63.79 | 51.53 | 73.43 | 62.27 | 63.11 | 67.07 | 65.05 |
| MFCC + PROS + SPEC + GLOT | 65.00 | 63.22 | 64.13 | 56.02 | 72.96 | 64.32 | 63.44 | 67.61 | 65.48 |
Maximum of sensitivity (sen.), specificity (spe.), and accuracy (acc.) are shown in bold.