Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 25;62(1-2):203–220. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12248

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Author (year) N Peer review IF Design Informant Continent Type of outcome Sex Ethnic minority Mean age Sample type
Presence natural mentor
DuBois and Silverthorn (2005a) 3187 Yes 4.14 Long Self USA Mixed B/G 32.60 21.40 General population
Hurd and Sellers (2013) 259 Yes 1.56 Cross Self/Teacher USA Mixed B/G 100 13.56 General population
Zimmerman et al. (2002) 770 Yes 2.07 Cross Self USA Mixed B/G 82.80 17.50 General population
Ahrens et al. (2010) 1714 Yes 1.22 Cross Self USA Mixed B/G 25 16.00 General population
Ahrens, DuBois, Richardson, Fan, and Lozano (2008) 310 Yes 5.47 Cross Self USA Mixed B/G 35 16.00 At risk population
Rhodes et al. (1992) 129 Yes 2.15 Cross Self USA Psychosocial problems Girls 100 18.07 At risk population
Rhodes et al. (1994) 54 Yes 2.15 Cross Self USA Mixed Girls 100 18.10 At risk population
Collins, Spencer, and Ward (2010) 96 Yes 0.38 Cross Interviewer USA Mixed B/G 47 19.00 At risk population
Dang, Conger, Breslau, and Miller (2014) 197 Yes 1.28 Cross Self USA Mixed B/G 75.6 18.00 At risk population
Erickson et al. (2009) 12,621 Yes 2.86 Long Official registration USA Academic B/G 35 21.72 General population
Hurd and Zimmerman (2010a) 615 Yes 2.15 Cross/Long Self USA Psychosocial problems B/G 100 17.51 General population
Hurd and Zimmerman (2010b) 93 Yes 2.48 Cross/Long Self USA Psychosocial problems Girls 100 17.66 At risk population
Hurd et al. (2014) 3334 Yes 2.05 Cross Self USA Mixed B/G 24.6 20.80 General population
Hurd, Varner, and Rowley (2013) 259 Yes 3.56 Cross Self USA Socio‐emotional B/G 100 13.56 General population
Sánchez, Esparza, and Cólon (2008) 140 Yes 0.80 Cross Self/Official registration USA Academic B/G 100 17.88 General population
Cavell, Meehan, Heffer, and Holladay (2002) 95 Yes 1.33 Cross Self USA Psychosocial problems B/G 17 18.70 At risk population
Kogan, Brody, and Chen (2011) 375 Yes 2.15 Long Self/Composite USA Mixed B/G 100 17.00 General population
Greeson, Usher, and Grinstein‐Weiss (2010) 7977 Yes 0.97 Long Self USA Vocational B/G 20 21.28 General population
Hagler, Raposa, and Rhodes (2017) 193 Long Self USA Mixed B/G 43.5 11.20 General population
McDonald and Lambert (2014) 16,386 Yes 2.15 Long Self USA Vocational B/G 22.50 General population
Linnehan (2003) 47 Yes 2.76 Long Self USA Mixed B/G 79 17.45 General population
McDonald, Erickson, Johnson, and Elder (2007) 5740 Yes 1.77 Long Self USA Vocational B/G 35 General population
Erickson and Phillips (2012) 8379 Yes 1.23 Long Self USA Academic B/G 47 15.36 General population
Munson and McMillen (2009) 339 Yes 0.97 Long Self USA Mixed B/G 55 19.04 At risk population
Relationship quality
Hurd et al. (2013) 259 Yes 3.56 Cross Self USA Socio‐emotional B/G 100 13.56 General population
Chang, Greenberger, Chen, Heckhausen, and Farruggia (2010) 754 Yes 2.48 Long Self USA Mixed B/G 77 17.50 General population
Schwartz, Chan et al. (2013) 1860 Yes 1.97 Cross Self USA Socio‐emotional B/G 44.4 15.00 General population
Sánchez et al. (2008) 140 Yes 0.80 Cross Self/Official registration USA Academic B/G 100 17.88 At risk population
Kogan et al. (2011) 116 Yes 1.79 Cross Self/Official registration USA Mixed B/G 100 19.50 At risk population
Bowers et al. (2012) 710 Yes 1.97 Long Self USA Socio‐emotional Boys 21.1 15.77 General population
Black, Grenard, Sussman, and Rohrbach (2010) 3320 Yes 1.67 Long Self USA Psychosocial problems B/G 59 15.30 General population
Klaw and Rhodes (1995) 204 Yes 2.40 Cross Self USA Mixed Girls 100 15.90 At risk population

N = number of participants; peer review = published in peer reviewed article (Yes/No); IF = impact factor of journal; design = cross‐sectional (Cross) or longitudinal (Long); informant = self‐report (Self), interviewer‐report (Interviewer) or teacher‐report (Teacher); type of outcome = internalizing, conduct problems, overall psychopathology, substance use (Psychosocial problems), social confidence and/or confidence (Social‐emotional), Academic, Vocational or two or more different outcome domains (Mixed); sex = only girls (Girls), only boys (Boys) or boys and girls (B/G); Ethnic minority = proportion of non‐Caucasian. The study of Hagler, Raposa, & Rhodes is unpublished.