Table 3.
Cases pertaining to different levels of disagreement
| Case Number | Nature of Disagreement |
|---|---|
| 1 | • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement for all raters (k = 8) |
| 2 | • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement for 75% of the raters (k = 6) |
| • 30% subjects with 1‐point and 20% subjects with 2‐point disagreement for 25% of the raters (k = 2) | |
| 3 | • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement for 50% of the raters (k = 4) |
| • 30% subjects with 1‐point and 20% subjects with 2‐point disagreement for 50% of the raters (k=4) | |
| 4 | • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement for 25% of the raters (k = 2) |
| • 30% subjects with 1‐point and 20% subjects with 2‐point disagreement for 75% of the raters (k=6) | |
| 5 | • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement, 10% subjects with 2‐point disagreement, 5%subjects with 3‐point disagreement and 5% subjects with 4‐point difference for 50% of the raters (k = 4) |
| • 10% subjects with 1‐point disagreement, 10% subjects with 2‐point disagreement, 10%subjects with 3‐point disagreement, and 10% subjects with 4‐point difference for 50% of the raters (k = 4) | |
| 6 | • 30% subjects with 1‐point disagreement, 10% subjects with 2‐point disagreement, 10%subjects with 3‐point disagreement, and 10% subjects with 4‐point difference for 50% of the raters (k = 4) |
| • 20% subjects with 1‐point disagreement, 20% subjects with 2‐point disagreement, 10%subjects with 3‐point disagreement, and 10% subjects with 4‐point difference for 50% of the raters (k = 4) |