Skip to main content
. 2018 May 25;57(4):420–435. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12184

Table 5.

Logistic regressions examining the contribution of cognitive variables and severity of depression to the prediction of diagnostic status

b (Wald statistic) Odds ratio (95% CI) R 2 Model
Cognitive variables model
Step 1
Constant 3.86 (0.93) .03 (Cox&Snell)
.04 (Nagelkerk)
Gender 0.33 (0.19) 1.39 (0.31–6.15) X 2(2) = 1.82
Age −.029 (0.93) 0.75 (0.46–1.21)
Step 2
Negative interpretation bias 0.03 (1.91) 1.03 (0.99–1.07) .21 (Cox&Snell)
.29 (Nagelkerk)
X 2(2) = 12.97**
Negative self‐evaluation 1.30 (4.25)* 3.67 (1.07–12.61)
MFQ model
Step 1
Constant 1.35 (0.16) .02 (Cox&Snell)
.03 (Nagelkerk)
Gender 0.73 (1.05) 2.08 (0.51–8.41) X 2(2) = 1.83
Age −0.15 (0.53) 0.86 (0.57–1.30)
Step 2
MFQ 0.10 (13.37)*** 1.10 (1.05–1.16) .23 (Cox&Snell)
.31 (Nagelkerk)
X 2(1) = 19.10***

CI = confidence interval; MFQ, Mood and Feelings Questionnaire.

*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.