Skip to main content
. 2018 May 17;50(6):818–824. doi: 10.1111/evj.12844

Table 1.

Model output for forelimb lameness dataset (n strides = 1183), for the hindlimb lameness dataset (n strides = 1182) and for the reduced dataset with induced hindlimb lameness and concurrent compensatory head nod (n strides = 482). The forelimb lameness dataset includes all trials with absolute mean values of HDmin ≥6 mm, the hindlimb dataset all trials with absolute PDmin values ≥3 mm. The reduced dataset includes all trials with hindlimb inductions and concurrent compensatory ipsilateral head movement asymmetry with an absolute HDmin value ≥6 mm

Analysis Dependent variable Independent variable Estimate SE P‐value
Forelimb lameness WDmin Intercept −0.09 1.258 0.9
HDmin 0.05 0.008 <0.0001
WDmax Intercept −1.42 2.272 0.53
HDmax 0.10 0.008 <0.0001
WDup Intercept −1.26 2.533 0.6
HDup 0.07 0.009 <0.0001
Hindlimb lameness WDmin Intercept 2.98 0.967 0.002
PDmin −0.55 0.013 <0.0001
WDmax Intercept −0.69 1.671 0.7
PDmax −0.35 0.014 <0.0001
WDup Intercept 1.90 1.796 0.3
PDup −0.47 0.012 <0.0001
Hindlimb lameness with compensatory head nod WDmin Intercept 2.76 1.159 0.02
PDmin −0.52 0.019 <0.0001
WDmax Intercept −1.52 2.090 0.5
PDmax −0.42 0.024 <0.0001
WDup Intercept 1.21 2.735 0.7
PDup −0.47 0.019 <0.0001