Table 2.
Improvement in Outcome Measures
| Outcome measure | Dysuria | Urgency | Frequency | ICIQ‐UI SF | 1‐h pad test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3‐month FU | |||||
| Improved a (%) | 100 (n = 29) | 93 (n = 27) | 97 (n = 27) | 79 (n = 23) | 90 (n = 26) |
| Not improved b (%) | 0 | 7 (n = 2) | 3 (n = 1) | 21 (n = 6) | 10 (n = 3) |
| Worse c (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6‐month FU | |||||
| Improved a (%) | 76 (n = 22) | 66 (n = 19) | 62 (n = 18) | 45 (n = 13) | 38 (n = 11) |
| Not improved b (%) | 24 (n = 7) | 31 (n = 9) | 38 (n = 11) | 48 (n = 14) | 59 (n = 17) |
| Worse c (%) | 0 | 3 (n = 1) | 0 | 7 (n = 2) | 3 (n = 1) |
Data is presented as a percentage of patients with corresponding improvement rate, which was calculated as ratio between values at FU and baseline values (n = absolute number of patients).
a
If improvement was ≥50%.
b
If improvement was <50%.
c
If improvement was negative (relative to baseline).