Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 21;73(9):1842–1850. doi: 10.1111/all.13433

Table 2.

Quality of Life assessments during the pollen season

Measures Treatments N Mean ± SD Relative differences (%) P‐values
Overall RQLQ Scores Placebo 170 1.407 ± 1.104 −17.1 .005
LPP 332 1.167 ± 1.063
Activity limitations Placebo 170 1.831 ± 1.451 −12.3 .093
LPP 336 1.606 ± 1.381
Sleep problems Placebo 170 0.914 ± 1.260 −23.1 .066
LPP 336 0.702 ± 1.096
Non‐nose/eye symptoms Placebo 170 1.240 ± 1.259 −20.9 .011
LPP 335 0.981 ± 1.188
Practical problem Placebo 170 2.220 ± 1.594 −13.8 .025
LPP 335 1.914 ± 1.557
Nose symptoms Placebo 170 1.875 ± 1.342 −15.3 .015
LPP 335 1.588 ± 1.276
Eye symptoms Placebo 170 1.224 ± 1.220 −12.0 .122
LPP 332 1.076 ± 1.166
Emotional function Placebo 170 0.860 ± 1.133 −21.2 .018
LPP 333 0.687 ± 1.086
Overall NRQLQ Scores Placebo 170 0.944 ± 0.907 −16.5 .006
LPP 338 0.789 ± 0.910
Sleep problems Placebo 171 0.754 ± 1.077 −24.3 .014
LPP 338 0.571 ± 0.961
Sleep time problems Placebo 170 0.774 ± 0.927 −17.3 .028
LPP 339 0.640 ± 0.888
Symptoms on waking in the morning Placebo 171 1.069 ± 1.123 −17.2 .009
LPP 338 0.885 ± 1.121
Practical problems Placebo 171 1.310 ± 1.004 −8.0 .025
LPP 339 1.205 ± 1.246

Values are shown according to the treatment planned based on observed cases. P‐values were calculated by Wilcoxon rank sum test.

LPP, Lolium perenne peptides, SD, standard deviation.