Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 6;9(3):382–392. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1297

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Results of the common‐effects model with inverse‐variance method (CE IV), the random‐effects model with the DerSimonian‐Laird method (DSL) and the Knapp‐Hartung method (KH), the beta‐binomial model (BBIN), and Bayesian method using half‐normal priors for τ with scales 0.5 (B‐HN(0.5)) and 1.0 (B‐HN(1.0)) for the sipuleucel‐T example [Colour figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]