Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;6(10):E1190–E1197. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-7382

Table 2. Characteristics of routine EGDs between the fast- vs moderate- vs slow-speed endoscopist groups.

Fast-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,052) Moderate-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,314) Slow-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,559) P value
Age, median (range)  67 (18 – 92)   67 (20 – 93)   68 (18 – 92) 0.321
Sex (%) male/female 649 (62)/403 (38)  833 (63)/481 (37)  649 (62)/403 (38) 0.460
Interval between EGDs (%) 0.215
  •  ≤ 1.5 years

827 (79) 1010 (77) 1230 (79)
  •  > 1.5 years

162 (15)  195 (15)  226 (14)
  • Unknown

 63 (6)  109 (8)  103 (7)
Purpose of EGD (%)
  • Screening/surveillance

530 (50)/522 (50)  600 (46)/714 (54)  762 (49)/797 (51) 0.107
Gastric mucosal atrophy (%)
  • Atrophy/non-atrophy

733 (70)/319 (30)  970 (74)/344 (26) 1113 (71)/446 (29) 0.078
Past history of gastric cancer (%)
  • With/without

352 (33)/700 (67)  471 (36)/ 843 (64)  569 (36)/990 (64) 0.265
Past history of esophageal cancer (%)
  • With/without

123 (12)/929 (88)  135 (10)/1179 (90)  194 (12)/1365 (88) 0.188
Endoscope model (%)
  • GIF-H260 /GIF-H290Z

487 (46)/565 (54)  571 (43)/743 (57)  741 (47)/818 (53) 0.087
Light source model (%)
  • SPECTRUM/ELITE

487 (46)/565 (54)  571 (43)/743 (57)  718 (46)/841 (54) 0.275
UGI biopsy cases (%) Done / Not done 561 (53)/491 (47)  639 (49)/675 (51)  794 (51)/765 (49) 0.075
Intensive training (%)
 < 1-year/ ≥ 1-year   0 (0)/1052 (100)  306 (23)/1008 (77)  585 (37)/974 (63)  < 0.001

EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy