Table 2. Characteristics of routine EGDs between the fast- vs moderate- vs slow-speed endoscopist groups.
Fast-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,052) | Moderate-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,314) | Slow-speed endoscopists group (n = 1,559) | P value | |
Age, median (range) | 67 (18 – 92) | 67 (20 – 93) | 68 (18 – 92) | 0.321 |
Sex (%) male/female | 649 (62)/403 (38) | 833 (63)/481 (37) | 649 (62)/403 (38) | 0.460 |
Interval between EGDs (%) | 0.215 | |||
|
827 (79) | 1010 (77) | 1230 (79) | |
|
162 (15) | 195 (15) | 226 (14) | |
|
63 (6) | 109 (8) | 103 (7) | |
Purpose of EGD (%) | ||||
|
530 (50)/522 (50) | 600 (46)/714 (54) | 762 (49)/797 (51) | 0.107 |
Gastric mucosal atrophy (%) | ||||
|
733 (70)/319 (30) | 970 (74)/344 (26) | 1113 (71)/446 (29) | 0.078 |
Past history of gastric cancer (%) | ||||
|
352 (33)/700 (67) | 471 (36)/ 843 (64) | 569 (36)/990 (64) | 0.265 |
Past history of esophageal cancer (%) | ||||
|
123 (12)/929 (88) | 135 (10)/1179 (90) | 194 (12)/1365 (88) | 0.188 |
Endoscope model (%) | ||||
|
487 (46)/565 (54) | 571 (43)/743 (57) | 741 (47)/818 (53) | 0.087 |
Light source model (%) | ||||
|
487 (46)/565 (54) | 571 (43)/743 (57) | 718 (46)/841 (54) | 0.275 |
UGI biopsy cases (%) Done / Not done | 561 (53)/491 (47) | 639 (49)/675 (51) | 794 (51)/765 (49) | 0.075 |
Intensive training (%) | ||||
< 1-year/ ≥ 1-year | 0 (0)/1052 (100) | 306 (23)/1008 (77) | 585 (37)/974 (63) | < 0.001 |
EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy