Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 8;6(10):E1190–E1197. doi: 10.1055/a-0655-7382

Table 5. Characteristics of routine EGD between the Intensive training < 1-year vs ≥ 1-year groups.

Intensive training < 1-year group (n = 891) Intensive training ≥ 1-year group (n = 3,034) P value
Age, median (range)  67 (21 – 88)   67 (18 – 93) 0.521
Sex (%)Male/female 542 (61)/349 (39) 1894 (62)/1140 (38) 0.388
Interval between EGDs (%) 0.606
  •  ≤ 1.5 years

699 (79) 2368 (78)
  •  > 1.5 years

135 (15)  447 (15)
  • Unknown

 56 (6)  219 (7)
Purpose of EGD (%)
  • Screening/Surveillance

405 (46)/486 (54) 1479 (49)/1555 (51) 0.084
Gastric mucosal atrophy (%)
  • Atrophy/non-atrophy

647 (73)/244 (27) 2169 (72)/865 (28) 0.512
Past history of gastric cancer (%)
  • With/without

359 (40)/532 (60) 1033 (34)/2001 (66) 0.001
Past history of esophageal cancer (%)
  • With/without

 91 (10)/800 (90)  361 (12)/2673 (88) 0.166
Endoscope model (%)
  • GIF-H260/GIF-H290Z

432 (49)/459 (51) 1367 (45)/1667 (55) 0.071
Light source model (%)
  • SPECTRUM/ELITE

425 (48)/466 (52) 1351 (44)/1683 (56) 0.095
UGI biopsy cases (%) Done/Not done 467 (52)/424 (48) 1527 (50)/1507 (50) 0.274
Inspection time, min, median (range 1 )  11.0 (8.2 – 13.9)    8.9 (6.4 – 11.4)  < 0.001

EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy

1

Interquartile range