Table 5. Characteristics of routine EGD between the Intensive training < 1-year vs ≥ 1-year groups.
Intensive training < 1-year group (n = 891) | Intensive training ≥ 1-year group (n = 3,034) | P value | |
Age, median (range) | 67 (21 – 88) | 67 (18 – 93) | 0.521 |
Sex (%)Male/female | 542 (61)/349 (39) | 1894 (62)/1140 (38) | 0.388 |
Interval between EGDs (%) | 0.606 | ||
|
699 (79) | 2368 (78) | |
|
135 (15) | 447 (15) | |
|
56 (6) | 219 (7) | |
Purpose of EGD (%) | |||
|
405 (46)/486 (54) | 1479 (49)/1555 (51) | 0.084 |
Gastric mucosal atrophy (%) | |||
|
647 (73)/244 (27) | 2169 (72)/865 (28) | 0.512 |
Past history of gastric cancer (%) | |||
|
359 (40)/532 (60) | 1033 (34)/2001 (66) | 0.001 |
Past history of esophageal cancer (%) | |||
|
91 (10)/800 (90) | 361 (12)/2673 (88) | 0.166 |
Endoscope model (%) | |||
|
432 (49)/459 (51) | 1367 (45)/1667 (55) | 0.071 |
Light source model (%) | |||
|
425 (48)/466 (52) | 1351 (44)/1683 (56) | 0.095 |
UGI biopsy cases (%) Done/Not done | 467 (52)/424 (48) | 1527 (50)/1507 (50) | 0.274 |
Inspection time, min, median (range 1 ) | 11.0 (8.2 – 13.9) | 8.9 (6.4 – 11.4) | < 0.001 |
EGD, esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Interquartile range