Table 4.
Items | Factor loadings | Correlation coefficients in the 5-factor model | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-factor model | 5-factor model | ||||||||
The robust maximum likelihood estimation method was used. *p < 0.05. | |||||||||
P1 | 0.87* | 0.88* | F1 (P) | F2 (E) | F3 (R) | F4 (M) | F5 (A) | ||
P2 | 0.83* | 0.88* | F1 (P) | 1.00 | |||||
P3 | -0.27* | 0.91* | F2 (E) | 0.94* | 1.00 | ||||
E1 | 0.84* | 0.77* | F3 (R) | 0.92* | 0.78* | 1.00 | |||
E2 | 0.76* | 0.86* | F4 (M) | 0.89* | 0.97* | 0.73* | 1.00 | ||
E3 | 0.45* | 0.78* | F5 (A) | 0.90* | 0.89* | 0.77* | 0.95* | 1.00 | |
R1 | 0.75* | 0.56* | Model fit | 1-factor | 5-factor | ||||
R2 | -0.21* | 0.71* | χ2 (df) | 648.43 (90) * | 351.30 (80) * | ||||
R3 | 0.68* | 0.83* | CFI | 0.705 | 0.892 | ||||
M1 | -0.07 | 0.80* | TLI | 0.656 | 0.858 | ||||
M2 | -0.22* | 0.84* | RMSEA (95% CI) | 0.141 (0.131, 0.152) | 0.105 (0.094, 0.116) | ||||
M3 | 0.52* | 0.87* | SRMR | 0.100 | 0.051 | ||||
A1 | 0.86* | 0.90* | 1-factor model vs. 5-factor model: Δχ2 (df) | 297.13 (10) * | |||||
A2 | 0.47* | 0.70* | |||||||
A3 | 0.68* | 0.67* |