Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct;214:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.034

Table 6.

Percentage change in GHQ caseness (with 95% CI) for each birth cohort between pre-recession, recession and austerity periods; p-values < 0.05 in bold.

Birth Cohort Sex % Change Pre-Recession to Recession (95% CI) p-value % Change Recession to Austerity (95% CI) p-value % Change Pre-Recession to Austerity (95% CI) p-value
WWII Men 0.52% (−1.70%, 2.74%) 0.647 1.21% (−1.51%, 3.93%) 0.385 1.68% (−0.45%, 3.80%) 0.122
Women 2.18% (−0.21%, 4.57%) 0.074 −2.87% (−5.80%, 0.06%) 0.055 −0.61% (−2.94%, 1.72%) 0.606
Boomers Men 1.75% (−0.52%, 4.01%) 0.131 −2.70% (−5.37%, −0.03%) 0.047 −0.92% (−3.07%, 1.23%) 0.401
Women −0.17% (−2.51%, 2.17%) 0.886 −0.04% (−2.70%, 2.61%) 0.974 −0.22% (−2.37%, 1.93%) 0.844
Gen X Men 4.99% (2.85%, 7.12%) <0.001 −3.71% (−6.44%, −0.98%) 0.008 1.57% (−0.39%, 3.53%) 0.117
Women 2.54% (0.52%, 4.56%) 0.014 1.09% (−1.39%, 3.57%) 0.388 3.57% (1.71%, 5.42%) <0.001
Jilted Men 4.75% (2.22%, 7.28%) <0.001 −3.01% (−6.26%, 0.25%) 0.070 2.00% (−0.28%, 4.27%) 0.085
Women 0.23% (−2.41%, 2.87%) 0.864 1.20% (−1.74%, 4.15%) 0.424 1.41% (−0.87%, 3.70%) 0.226