Table 4.
Multiplex qPCR | Ready-to-use Compact Dry | Traditional culture | |
---|---|---|---|
Bacterial amount inoculated | 5.3 log10 | 5.3 log10 | 5.3 log10 |
| |||
Bacterial amount detected (average) a | 5.7 log10 | 6.6 log10 | 5.5 log10 |
| |||
Estimated time of analysis | 2 hours (simultaneous quantification of Salmonella, E. coli and S. aureus) | 1 day (E. coli and S. aureus) 2 days (Salmonella) |
3-4 days ( S. aureus) 5-6 days ( E. coli) 5 days (Salmonella) |
| |||
Advantages | (i) Monitoring in real time; (ii) Does not need to perform post-reaction processing; (iii) Fast; (iv) Confirmation of amplification in real time; (v) Specific, sensitive and reproducible; (vi) Simultaneous quantification of different pathogens. |
(i) Ease of sample inoculation; (ii) Smaller size than conventional plates; (iii) Easy to discard (iv) Reduction of practical use and laboratory time; (v) Less employee training; |
(i) Standardized method; (ii) “Gold standard” in food diagnostics; (iii) Do not require expensive infrastructure; (iv) Realistic results (similar bacterial quantification to the amount inoculated). |
| |||
Disadvantages | (i) Competitive amplification (decrease of the efficiency and sensitivity in multiplex reaction); (ii) Need for qualified personnel; (iii) High cost of equipment; (iv) Do not distinguish living cells and dead cells. |
(i) False positive results; (ii) Spends, at least, one day for results. |
(i) Analyses are labor-intensive (ii) Require a lot of reagent media; (iii) Time consuming analysis (more than 3 days). |
| |||
Purposes of use | Fast screening methods of large number of samples. Useful for microbiological quality control. |
Screening method for bacterial enumeration. Useful for microbiological quality control. | Official method for food microbiological analysis. Useful for regulatory agencies. |
aAverage of bacterial quantification (Salmonella, E. coli, and S. aureus) in ground beef, milk, and oyster meat. Salmonella was not quantified through Compact Dry and Traditional culture method.