Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 30;16(5):5807–5812. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9372

Table IV.

Comparison of the detection rate of fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with LCT among the four groups (%).

Fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with LCT Sensitivitya Specificity Positive predictive value Negative predictive value False positive rate False negative rate
Group A (BWC) 86.17% (193/224) 59.62% (31/52) 90.19% (193/214) 50.00% (31/62) 40.38% (21/52) 13.84% (31/224)
Group B (BAL) 87.13% (149/171) 60.61% (20/33) 91.98% (149/162) 47.62% (20/42) 39.39% (13/33) 12.87% (22/171)
Group C (EBUS-TBNA) 94.81% (146/154) 84.85% (28/33) 96.69% (146/151) 77.78% (28/36) 15.15% (5/33) 5.19% (8/154)
Group D (TBLB) 88.54% (170/192) 57.14 (24/42) 90.43% (170/188) 52.17% (24/46) 42.86% (18/42) 11.46% (22/192)
χ2 7.642 7.707 6.118 8.094 6.634 7.642
P-value 0.054 0.052 0.106 0.044 0.085 0.054
a

Detected sensitivity/detection rate = the number of cases successfully diagnosed with lung cancer through pathology by fiberoptic bronchoscopy combined with LCT within the group/the number of cases pathologically diagnosed with lung cancer within the group ×100%. LCT, liquid-based cytology test; BWC, bronchoscopic washing cultures; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; EBUS-TBNA, endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration; TBLB, transbronchial lung biopsy.