Table 4.
Row Labels | Coresident | Nonresident | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Insecure | Secure | Insecure | Secure | |
% White | 35% | 49% | 30% | 26% |
% Black | 23%* | 16% | 46% | 45% |
% Hisp | 39%** | 30% | 18% | 24% |
% Other Race | 3% | 6% | 6% | 4% |
% Unknown Race | 0% | 0% | 0% | <1% |
29.7*** | 31.2 | 26.7* | 28.9 | |
Age | [0.3] | [0.3] | [0.3] | [0.3] |
% < HS | 26%* | 17% | 39% | 32% |
% HS Only | 37% | 21% | 39% | 37% |
% Some College | 30% | 33% | 17% | 21% |
% College Grad | 6% | 29% | 4% | 8% |
% Education Unknown | <1% | <1% | 1% | 2% |
% Married at BL | 62%** | 79% | 29% | 34% |
% Employed at BL | 90% | 94% | 81% | 78% |
% in High Poverty Tracts | 15% | 10% | 17% | 19% |
Note: Entries are stratified average predicted values from regression models predicting each characteristic with fathers’ coresidence and housing security status at each wave, and wave FE.
P<.05,
P<.01,
P<.001 in within-coresidence comparisons by security. Co-residence differences in race (black/white), age, and education are statistically significant at P<.05 or less.