Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Marriage Fam. 2018 May 17;80(5):1176–1186. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12492

Table 4.

Demographic Description of Secure and Insecure Fathers, by Coresidence Status

Row Labels Coresident Nonresident
Insecure Secure Insecure Secure
% White 35% 49% 30% 26%
% Black 23%* 16% 46% 45%
% Hisp 39%** 30% 18% 24%
% Other Race 3% 6% 6% 4%
% Unknown Race 0% 0% 0% <1%
29.7*** 31.2 26.7* 28.9
Age [0.3] [0.3] [0.3] [0.3]
% < HS 26%* 17% 39% 32%
% HS Only 37% 21% 39% 37%
% Some College 30% 33% 17% 21%
% College Grad 6% 29% 4% 8%
% Education Unknown <1% <1% 1% 2%
% Married at BL 62%** 79% 29% 34%
% Employed at BL 90% 94% 81% 78%
% in High Poverty Tracts 15% 10% 17% 19%

Note: Entries are stratified average predicted values from regression models predicting each characteristic with fathers’ coresidence and housing security status at each wave, and wave FE.

*

P<.05,

**

P<.01,

***

P<.001 in within-coresidence comparisons by security. Co-residence differences in race (black/white), age, and education are statistically significant at P<.05 or less.