Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Crime Justice. 2018 Mar 26;47(1):255–364. doi: 10.1086/696590

Table 4. Meta-Analytic Results for Associations between Individual Factors and Child Conduct Problems and Youth Violence.

Heterogeneity
Predictor Behavioral Outcome Number of Studies Studies Included (#) Type of Association Effect Size d 95% CI pa I2 pb
Prior aggression Aggression 9 (4, 11, 10, 13, 16, 20, 21, 27, 30) Bivariate   1.6 (.9 to 3.3) <.001 99.3% <.001
Prior conduct problems Conduct problems 9 (4, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 28, 31, 37) Bivariate     .9 (.6 to 2.1) <.001 97.1% <.001
Crime 2 (4, 28) Bivariate     .12 (−.20 to .44) .437 76% .041
Violence 2 (4, 22) Bivariate     .34 (.13 to .56) .018 83% .015
Hyperactivity Conduct problems 2 (9, 10) Bivariate     .51 (.34 to .69) <.001   0% .590
Crime 2 (4, 28) Bivariate     .04 (−.40 to .47) .867 87% .006
Poor educational performance Aggression 2 (10, 21) Bivariate     .00 (−.53 to .52) .993 93% <.001
Intimate partner violence 2 (28, 34) Bivariate     .05 (−.17 to .28) .650 78% .032
Drug use Violence 2 (23, 34) Bivariate     .69 (.46 to .92) <.001 51% .154
Sociability Conduct problems 2 (20, 21) Bivariate   −.03 (−.20 to .14) .701   0% .335
Social competence Conduct problems 2 (10, 21) Bivariate   −.43 (−.58 to 2.28) <.001   0% .735

Note.—# = study ID number shown in table 2; pa = p-value for d effect size; pb = p-value for a π2 test for heterogeneity. Random-effects models.