Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Crime Justice. 2018 Mar 26;47(1):255–364. doi: 10.1086/696590

Table 7. Meta-Analytic Results on Family Sociodemographic Factors in Relation to Child Conduct Problems and Youth Violence.

Heterogeneity
Predictor Behavioral Outcome Number of Studies Studies Included (#) Type of Association Effect Size d 95% CI pa I2 pb
Poor family during childhood Conduct problems 3 (4, 5, 37) Bivariate .12 (.03 to .21) .012 82% .001
Violence 2 (3, 4) Bivariate .18 (.07 to .30) .001 0% .658
Low maternal education Conduct problems 3 (4, 8, 12) Bivariate .15 (−.02 to .32) .088 57% .099
Young mother at birth Conduct problems 2 (4, 8) Bivariate .20 (−.03 to .42) .087 83% .015
Violence 2 (3, 4) Bivariate .21 (.01 to .41) .045 60% .059
Single mother at birth Conduct problems 2 (4, 8) Bivariate .17 (.09 to .25) <.001 0% .424
Violence 2 (3, 4) Bivariate .01 (−.13 to .15) .853 0% .793
Many siblings Violence 2 (3, 4) Bivariate .06 (−.06 to .19) .324 0% .598

Note.—# = study ID number shown in table 2; pa = p-value for d effect size; pb = p-value for a χ2 test for heterogeneity. Random-effects models.