Table 7. Characteristics of quantitative and mixed-method studies included in the review with populations at risk.

Author	Period of prevalence	Study design	Setting	Method of data collection	Instruments/ Tools used to measure CSA	Sample size and sampling strategy	Age (in years)	Type of sexual abuse			Prevalence	Perpetration
								Non-contact	Contact	Forced intercourse
Deb et al. (2011a) #3 [66]	Childhood	Case Control (120 sexually abused girls and 120 non- sexually abused girls)	Observation home/shelter home and schools	Administered structured interview	Sexual Abuse Screening Questionnaire	240 Young girls Purposive sampling	13–18	X	X	X	17%-46%	Not included
Deb et al. (2011b) #3 [65]	Childhood	Case Control (120 sexually abused girls and 120 non- sexually abused girls)	Observation home/shelter home and schools	Administered structured interview	Sexual Abuse Screening Questionnaire	240 Young girls Purposive sampling	13–18	X	X	X	17%-46%	Not included
Reed et al. (2013) [98]	Childhood	Cross-sectional	Community	Administered structured interview	Not stated	850 FSW’s Respondent driven sampling	18–40	X			20.2%	Not included
Jangam et al. (2015) [36]	Childhood	Case control (609 Women with psychiatric disorders as cases and 100 education and age-matched controls)	Clinical facility	Administered structured interview	ISPCAN** Child Abuse Screening Tool-Retrospective (ICAST-R)	709 women Consecutive sampling method	18–50	X	X	X	13.3%- Cases 8.0%- Controls	Not reported
Silverman et al. (2014) [73]	Past year experience of CSA	Cross Sectional	ASHA Center	Administered structured interview	Not stated	211 HIV infected FSW’s Stratified random sampling	>18		X	X	46.20%	Not included

# Data based on an Intervention Study.

* Mixed Methods Study.

**International Society for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse and Neglect Tool-Retrospective (ISPCAN).

² Studies based on same data set but reporting different health outcomes.

³ Studies based on same data set but reporting different health outcome.