Table 2. Models’ performance analysis.
| AUC (95% CI) | AIC | Brier’s Score | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dens | 0.75 (0.66, 0.85) | 113.2 | 0.1792 |
| LAC | 0.65 (0.54, 0.76) | 126.1 | 0.1982 |
| FD | 0.80 (0.71, 0.88) | 106.1 | 0.1629 |
| Area | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 97.1 | 0.1417 |
| Area+Dens | 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) | 99.0 | 0.1420 |
| Area+LAC | 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) | 98.4 | 0.1397 |
| Area+FD | 0.91 (0.85, 0.97) | 84.4 | 0.1138 |
Dens–Vessel Density. LAC–Lacunarity. FD–Fractal dimension. AUC–area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. CI–Confidence Interval, AIC -Akaike information criterion.