Each panel compares the distributions of
ni among five geographic regions, with 20 individuals per region. The distribution of
ni is broadly similar among geographic regions for all categories of SNPs. (
A)
ni computed on 17,129,351SNPs. Asians (Eastern, EAS and Southern Asians, SAS) have a significantly lower mean
ni than the other three regions (Tukey test, p<0.01). (
B)
ni computed on synonymous sites. SAS have a lower mean
ni than AFR (Africans) (Tukey test, p
=0.0004).
C)
ni computed on non-synonymous sites. SAS have a lower mean
ni than AFR (Africans) (Tukey test, p
=0.009).
D)
ni computed on a set of sites assumed to be evolving neutrally (see text and
Figure 1). SAS have a significantly lower mean
ni count than non-Asians (Tukey test, p=0.0000006). This difference remains in transcribed regions (
E) where SAS have a lower mean
ni count than AFR (p=0.00005) and EUR (Europeans, p=0.002) but disappears in neutrally evolving non-transcribed regions (
F), which suggests that background selection could still be acting in transcribed regions with relatively large recombination in South Asian populations (SAS).