Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 11;84(11):2502–2521. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13705

Table 4.

Outcomes of comparison group within included studies

Off‐label Author (reference) Main outcome Baseline vs. final outcome in comparison group
Proteinuric kidney disease Juarez et al. 20 Geometric mean (95%CI) of UPCR (g g–1) 1.33 (0.83–2.18) to 1.01 (0.69–1.80; P = NS)
Mean and SD of GFR (ml min–1 1.73 m–2) Baseline = 46 ± 16 and decreased with a median rate of 3.3 (95%CI, 1.8–4.7)
Menne et al. 18 Mean UACR (mg mmol–1)‐ adjusted ratio 9.1 to 4.5
Laverman et al. 17 Mean (95%CI) of total proteinuria (g 24‐h–1) 4.5 (3.5, 6.4) to 2.2 (1.2, 4.8; P < 0.05)
Mean (95%CI) of creatinine clearance (ml/min) 80 (66, 96) to 73 (59, 89)
Poulsen et al. 25 Geometric mean ± tolerance factor E‐UAE (μg min–1) 150.1 ± 3.7 to 213.6 ± 6.9
Mogensen et al. 23 Adjusted mean reduction in UACR [Geometric mean (tolerance factor)] 24 (0 to 43) [Baseline = 5.9 (1.1)] (P = 0.05)
Tarnow et al. 27 Mean (95%CI) albuminuria mg 24‐h–1 Baseline = 1033 (760–1406) and increased by 12% (–10 to 40; P = NS)
Mean and SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) Baseline = 85 ± 6 and declined 0.5 ± 0.1 ml. min–1. month–1 (P < 0.001)
Crepaldi et al. 21 Mean and SD of AER (μg/min) 70 (28–174) to 58 (2–198; P < 0.03) 88 (21–187) to 119 (4–176)*
Mean and SD of creatinine clearance (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 105 ± 14 to 101 ± 15 110 ± 15 to 105 ± 15*
Mean and SD of urinary albumin concentration (g dl–1) 4.4 ± 0.3 to 4.2 ± 0.4 4.4 ± 0.2 to 4.4 ± 0.3*
Mean (95%CI) reduction of risk of progression to macroalbuminuria 41.4% (22.1–64.3%; P = 0.05)
regression rate from macroalbuminuria to normoalbuminuria 0% 4%*
Janssen et al. 16 Mean ± SEM of GFR (ml min–1) 45 ± 8 to 45 ± 8 (P = NS)
Mean ± SEM of FF (%) 23 ± 2 to 25 ± 2 (P = NS)
Mean ± SEM of UPCR (g mmol–1) 0.56 to 0.69 (P = NS)
Mitchell et al. 22 Mean ± SEM (range) of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 56 ± 5 (23–65) to 53 ± 7 (13–108; P = NS)
Mean ± SEM (range) of RPF rate (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 282 ± 27 (130–456) to 319 ± 38 (160–594; P = NS)
Mean ± SEM (range) of FF (%) 21 ± 2 (11–33) to 19 ± 3 (9–46)
Chaturvedi et al. 28 Geometric mean (IQR) of AER (μg min–1) 8 (4.7–14) to 9.4
Rossing et al. 26 Means ± antilog SE of urinary IgG (mg 24‐h–1h) 71 ± 1.19 to 81 ± 1.19 (P = NS)
Means ± antilog SE of fractional clearance of albumin (× 10–6) 215 ± 1.23 to 297 ± 1.29 (P < 0.05)
Means ± antilog SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 85 ± 6 to 81
albuminuria (mg 24‐h–1) 1087 ± 1.2 to 1271
Nielsen et al. 24 Means ± antilog SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 74 ± 8 and – 0.60 ± 0.11 decreased during the study
Geometric mean ± antilog SE of Albuminuria (mg 24‐h–1) Baseline = 1578 ± –1.2 and reduced 15% (–13 to 34%; P = NS)
means ± SE of Fractional albumin clearance (×106) 553 ± 1.0 and increased 6% (–31 to 31%)
Ranieri et al. 19 Mean ± SD of GFR (ml min–1) 133.06 ± 15.75 to 120.17 ± 11.84 (P = NS) 115.5 ± 1 to 116.94 ± 11.11 (P = NS)ϕ
Mean ± SD of FF (%) 18.39 ± 2.17 to 19.78 ± 2.44 (P = NS) 20.06 ± 3.81 to 19.72 ± 2.07 (P = NS)ϕ
Mean ± SD of UAE (mg 24‐h–1) 44.7 ± 9.5 to 69.3 ± 6.4(P < 0.01) 76.6 ± 5.6 to 71.7 ± 7.5 (P = NS)ϕ
*placebo, Nifedipine, ϕbaseline to first phase with amlodipine, baseline to first phase of lisinopril, end of first phase with lisinopril to second phase of amlodipine, end of first phase with amlodipine to second phase of lisinopril
Off‐label Author (reference) Main outcome Baseline vs. final outcome in lisinopril group P‐value lisinopril vs. comparison
Proteinuric kidney disease Juarez et al. 20 Geometric mean (95%CI) of UPCR (g g–1) 0.92 (0.52–1.66) to 0.68 (0.38–1.20; P = NS)
Mean and SD of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 48 ± 14 and decreased with a median rate of 3.8 (95%CI, 1.8–6.3)
Menne et al. 18 Mean UACR (mg mmol–1)‐ adjusted ratio 9.6 to 5.7 adjusted ratio: 76%, CI: 48–118% 0.213
Laverman et al. 17 Mean (95%CI) of total proteinuria (g 24‐h–1) 4.5 (3.5–6.4) to 1.4 (0.5–2.9; P < 0.05) <0.05
Mean (95%CI) of creatinine clearance (ml/min) 80 (66–96) to 72 (52–92)
Poulsen et al. 25 Geometric mean ± tolerance factor E‐UAE (μg min–1) 96.8 ± 1.8 to 48.3 ± 3.1 0.04
Mogensen et al. 23 Adjusted mean reduction in UACR [Geometric mean (tolerance factor)] 39 (20 to 54) [Baseline = 6.6 (1.1)] (<0.001)
Tarnow et al. 27 Mean (95%CI) albuminuria mg 24‐h–1 Baseline = 1554 (980–2465) and reduced by 52% (95%CI 14–73) <0.001
Mean and SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) Baseline = 85 ± 5 and declined 0.5 ± 0.1 ml min–1 month–1 (P < 0.001) NS
Crepaldi et al. 21 Mean and SD of AER (μg/min) 54 (20–128) to 29 (5–173; P < 0.003)
Mean and SD of creatinine clearance (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 113 ± 16 to 109 ± 19
Mean and SD of Urinary albumin concentration (g/dl) 4.4 ± 0.4 to 4.3 ± 0.3
Mean (95%CI) reduction of risk of progression to macroalbuminuria 49.1% (26.8–63.4%; P < 0.03)
Regression rate from macroalbuminuria to normoalbuminuria 15% < 0.001
Janssen et al. 16 Mean ± SEM of GFR (ml/min) 55 ± 11 to 50 ± 10 (P < 0.01)
Mean ± SEM of FF (%) 24 ± 2 to 21 ± 2 (P < 0.001)
Mean ± SEM of UPCR (g/mmol) 0.39 ± 0.17 to 0.26 ± 0.11 (P < 0.05) <0.05
Mitchell et al. 22 Mean ± SEM (range) of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 46 ± 6 (18–78) to 42 ± 6 (18–83; P = NS) NS
Mean ± SEM (range) of RPF rate (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 262 ± 37 (122–570) to 247 ± 42 (62–523; P = NS) NS
Mean ± SEM (range) of FF (%) 19 ± 2 (9–37) to 21 ± 4 (8–65; P = NS) NS
Chaturvedi et al. 28 Geometric mean (IQR) of AER (μg min–1) 8 (4.4–14.8) to 7.3 0.03
Rossing et al. 26 Means ± antilog SE of Urinary IgG (mg 24‐h–1) 101 ± 1.29 to 64 ± 1.38 (P < 0.05) <0.05
Means ± antilog SE of Fractional clearance of albumin (× 10–6) 380 ± 1.29 to 213 ± 1.35 (P < 0.05) <0.05
Means ± antilog SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 85 ± 5 to 73.5 <0.05
albuminuria (mg 24‐h–1) 1513 ± 1.3 to 790 0.001
Nielsen et al. 24 Means ± antilog SE of GFR (ml min–1 1.73‐m–2) 75 ± 6 and –0.67 ± 0.10 decreased during the study 0.63
Geometric mean ± antilog SE of Albuminuria (mg 24‐h–1) Baseline = 963 ± 1.2 and reduced 55% (29–72%; P < 0.05) 0.01
means ± SE of Fractional albumin clearance (×106) (323 ± – 1.2 and reduced 52% (8–75%) 0.03
Ranieri et al. 19 Mean ± SD of GFR (ml min–1) 116.94 ± 11.11 to 127.27 ± 18.89 (P < 0.01) 119.61 ± 16.01 to 133.06 ± 15.7 (P < 0.01)
Mean ± SD of FF (%) 19.72 ± 2.07 to 18.22 ± 2.3 (P < 0.01) 20.06 ± 2.01 to 18.39 ± 2.17 (P < 0.01)
Mean ± SD of UAE (mg 24‐h−1) 71.7 ± 7.5 to 54.3 ± 3 (P < 0.01) 77.1 ± 8.1 to 44.7 ± 9.5 (P < 0.01) <0.01
*placebo, Nifedipine, ϕbaseline to first phase with amlodipine, baseline to first phase of lisinopril, end of first phase with lisinopril to second phase of amlodipine, end of first phase with amlodipine to second phase of lisinopril
Off‐label use Author (Ref) Main outcome Final outcome vs. baseline in comparison group
Atrial fibrillation Van Den Berg et al. 30 Mean ± SD of heart rate (beats min–1) 83 ± 14 to 81 + 13 (P = NS)
Median number of isolated
premature ventricular beats h–1 (range)
23 (5–340) to 109 (22–372)
Haywood et al. 31 New AF per 1000 16.3 22.4 20.9¥
Odds ratio for univariable logistic model 1.346 1.073 1.000¥
Odds ratio for multivariable logistic model 1.326 1.083 1.000¥
CM in patients with DMD Allen et al. 32 Mean EF (%) 48.4 to 55.2 (P = 0.03)
Diabetic retinopathy Mehlsen et al. 36 Mean (95%CI) of diameter change of retinal artery after exercise + flicker (%) 1.8 (0.1–3.5) to 2.0 (0.3–3.6)
Mean (95%CI) of diameter change of retinal vein after exercise + flicker (%) 4.4 (2.6–6.1) to 5.3 (3.5–7.0)
Chaturvedi et al. 37 Incidence of retinopathy: odds ratio 15/62
Regression of retinopathy 28/117
Myocardial fibrosis Brilla et al. 34 Myocardial hydroxyproline concentration (μg mg–1) 9.5 ± 0.5 to 10.4 ± 0.6 (P = NS)
Collagen volume fraction (%) 6.4 ± 0.8 to 6.5 ± 0.8 (P = NS)
Inflammatory cystoid macular oedema Kooij et al. 40 Number (%) of patients with improvement of cystoid macular oedema 9 of 40 (23%)
Left ventricular hypertrophy Christian et al. 34 LV mass index (g m–2.7) 176 ± 17 to 145 ± 11 (P = 0.08)
Mean ± SD of Cornell voltage overall (μV) 1451 ± 620 to 1427 ± 630 (P = 0.0045) 1440 ± 627 to 1434 ± 636 (P = 0.3438)¥
Ernst et al. 33. Prevalence (%) of LVH by Cornell voltage 482/7151 (6.74) to 311/4753 (6.54) 783/12102 (6.47) to 488/7947 (6.14)¥
Individuals experienced regression of their LVH (%) 50.21 52.96
Migraine Schrader et al. 41 Mean ± SD of h with headache 162 ± 142
Mean ± SD of days with migraine 18.5 ± 10
Mitral valve regurgitation Wong et al. 35 Mean ± SD of change in mitral regurgitant fraction (%) +3.7% ± 3.2
Mean ± SD of change of MR jet to LA area ratio –10.9% ± 2.4
Mean ± SD of LA dimension (mm) measured by M‐mode techniques 45.4 ± 8 to 46.7 ± 8 (P = NS)
Oligospermia and infertility Mbah et al. 42 Mean ± SD (95%CI) sperm cell count (106 ml–1) 17.1 (12.0–2.2) to 12.8 (8.2–19.0; P ≤ 0.02) 7.43 ± 3.97 to 7.0 (4.2–10.1; P = NS)ϕ
Mean ± SD (95%CI) sperm cells with good motility (%) 41.1 (32.1–50.6) to 15.3 (12.2–17.7; P ≤ 0.008) 22.12 ± 4.4 to 22.2 (18.6–25.7; P = NS)ϕ
Mean ± SD (95%CI) sperm cells with abnormal morphology (%) 15.3 (11.6–19.8) to 28.2 (22.5–33.9; P ≤ 0.03) 44.12 ± 2.6 to 44.1 (39.1–50.2; P = NS)ϕ
Prevention of diabetes ALLHAT Group 39 Number (%) of patients with FBS ≥ 126 mg dl–1 among baseline‐nondiabetics 154 (9.8) 302 (11.6)¥
Fogari and Roberto 38 Glucose infusion rate (mg min–1 kg–1) 5.79 ± 0.33 to 6.21 ± 0.41 (P = NS)
Total glucose requirement (g) 31.9 ± 3.4 to 33.8 ± 3.3 (P = NS)
Prevention of pneumonia Lee et al. 43 Unadjusted OR (95%CI) of Pneumonia or death
The incidences of pneumonia (%) 47.4
¥Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, Doxazosin, ϕbaseline to the first phase with placebo, baseline to the first phase of lisinopril, end of the first phase with lisinopril to the second phase of placebo, end of the first phase with placebo to the second phase of lisinopril
Off‐label use Author (reference) Main outcome Final outcome vs. baseline in lisinopril group (P value) P‐value lisinopril vs. comparison
Atrial fibrillation Van Den Berg et al. 30 mean ± SD of heart rate (beats/min) 92 ± 9 to 88 + 9 (P = NS)
Median number of isolated
premature ventricular beats/h (range)
34 (2–228) to 27 (4–335) 0.040
Haywood et al. 31 New AF per 1000 20.6
Odds ratio for univariable logistic model 0.987 0.90¥
Odds ratio for multivariable logistic model 0.939 0.59¥
CM in patients with DMD Allen et al. 32 Mean EF (%) 47.5 to 54.6 (P = 0.02) NS
Diabetic retinopathy Mehlsen et al. 36 Mean (95%CI) of diameter change of retinal artery after exercise + flicker (%) 1.8 (0.1–3.5) to 1.0 (1.4–3.4) 0.43
Mean (95%CI) of diameter change of retinal vein after exercise + flicker (%) 4.4 (2.6–6.1) to 2.3 (0.2–4.8) 0.02
Chaturvedi et al. 37 Incidence of retinopathy ‐Odds ratio 13/72 OR = 0.69 (95%CI 0.30–0.59) 0.4
Regression of retinopathy 33/103 OR = 1.48 (95%CI 0.82–2.68) 0.2
Myocardial fibrosis Brilla et al. 34 Myocardial hydroxyproline concentration (μg mg–1) 9.9 ± 0.3 to 8.3 ± 0.4 (P = 0.001) <0.00001
Collagen volume fraction (%) 6.9 ± 0.6 to 6.3 ± 0.6 (P < 0.01) <0.05
Inflammatory cystoid macular oedema Kooij et al. 40 Number (%) of patients with improvement of cystoid macular oedema 10 of 40 (25) 0.79
Left ventricular hypertrophy Christian et al. 34 LV mass index lisinopril (g m–2.7) 170 ± 16 to177 ± 15 (P = NS)
Mean ± SD of Cornell voltage overall (μV) 1425 ± 615 to 1435 ± 637 (P = 0.24) 0.9433¥
Ernst et al. 33. Prevalence (%) of LVH by Cornell voltage 473/7123 (6.64) to 292/4494 (6.50) NS¥
Individuals experienced regression of their LVH (%) 49.27 NS¥
Migraine Schrader et al. 41 Mean ± SD of hours with headache 129 ± 125 <0.05
Mean ± SD of days with migraine 14.5 ± 11 <0.05
Mitral valve regurgitation Wong et al. 35 Mean ± SD of change in mitral regurgitant fraction (%) –6.4% ± 3.5 <0.05
Mean ± SD of change of MR jet to LA area ratio –15.7% ± 3.7 NS
Mean ± SD of LA dimension (mm) measured by M‐mode techniques 44.3 ± 7 to 44.1 ± 8 (P = NS) NS
Oligospermia and infertility Mbah et al. 42 Mean ± SD (95%CI) sperm cell count (106 ml–1) 7.0 (4.2–10.1) to 13.9 (8.7–17.5; P < 0.004) 5.29 ± 2.6 to 17.1 (12.0–22.2; P < 0.03)
Mean ± SD (95%CI) sperm cells with good motility (%) 22.2 (18.6–25.7) to 30.3 (26.0–35.1; P ≤ 0.005) 17.33 ± 3.2 to 41.1 (32.1–50.6; P < 0.05)
Mean ± SD (95%CI) Sperm cells with abnormal morphology (%) 44.1 (39.1–50.2) to 11.8 (6.0–17.2; P ≤ 0.03) 42.91 ± 5.1 to 15.3 (11.6–19.8; P ≤ 0.04)
Prevention of diabetes ALLHAT Group 39 Number (%) of patients with FBS ≥ 126 mg dl–1 among baseline‐nondiabetics 119 (8.1) <0.001¥
Fogari and Roberto 38 Glucose infusion rate (mg min–1 kg–1) 5.74 ± 0.31 to 7.21 ± 0.39 (P = 0.05) 0.05
Total glucose requirement (g) 32.5 ± 3.2 to 39.8 ± 3.6
Prevention of pneumonia Lee et al. 43 Unadjusted OR (95%CI) of Pneumonia or death 1.80 (0.69, 4.72; P = 0.232)
The incidences of pneumonia (%) 57.6 0.390

¥Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, Doxazosin, ϕbaseline to the first phase with placebo, baseline to the first phase of lisinopril, end of the first phase with lisinopril to the second phase of placebo, end of the first phase with placebo to the second phase of lisinopril

AER, albumin exertion rate; AF, atrial fibrillation; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CCB, calcium channel blocker; CI, confidence interval; CM, cardiomyopathy; DMD, Duchenne muscular dystrophy; ERPF, effective renal plasma flow; EF, ejection fraction; FF, filtration fraction; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; RPF, renal plasma flow; LA, left atrium; LAV, left atrium volume; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; MR, Mitral valve regurgitation; NS, non‐significant; SD, standard deviation; SEM, Standard Error of the Mean; UAE, urine albumin exertion; UACR, urine albumin: creatinine ratio; UPCR, urine protein: creatinine ratio