. 2018 Mar 2;33(1):87–95. doi: 10.1007/s12250-018-0017-2

Table 2.

Amino acid identity, TRS and sequence comparisons of BatCoV HKU9-2202 with BatCoV HKU9 and BatCoV GCCDCC1.

ORFs	Nucleotide position (start to end)	Predict size (aa) of protein	Pairwise amino acid identity (%)^a BatCoV HKU9-2202 vs		Leader TRS and intergenic TRS	Distance from TRS and ATG
ORFs	Nucleotide position (start to end)	Predict size (aa) of protein	HKU9-4^b	GCCDC1^c	Leader TRS and intergenic TRS	Distance from TRS and ATG
ORF1ab	230–20991	6921	90.2	75.1	CTTGAACGAACTTAA	152
S	20951–24748	1266	63.8	61.2	AGTGAACGAACTTGT	42
NS3	24745–25438	231	82.8	50.2	AATAAACGAACAGCA	3
E^d	25437–25667	77	96.1	67.1	CAACGTCGAACTATA	4
M	25672–26346	225	91.0	79.7	CTTGAACGAACAAGA	25
N	26410–27819	470	85.5	66.3	TTTGAACGAACCTAT	5
NS7a	27857–28450	198	23.2	32.3	CTTGAACGAACATGA	0
NS7b	28447–28890	148	30.5	27.4	GGTTACGAACGTCT	7

^aCalculated with MegAlign using the Jotun Hein method.

^bGenBank accession numbers of the referred HKU9-4: EF065516.

^cGenBank accession numbers of the referred GCCDC1: NC030886.

^dNucleotide site difference compared with the conserved TRS core sequence is underlined