Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Environ Prot (Irvine, Calif). 2017 Apr;8(4):394–415. doi: 10.4236/jep.2017.84029

Table 3.

Summary PC emission assessment surveys with focus on malfunctions

Site HHP Detects OGI Detects Malf. PCs Malf. PCs Malf. PC1 Emission rate(s)
(N, %) (N, %) (N, %) Identity (scf/h)
Oil 1 0, 0 0, 0 0, 0 N/A N/A
Oil 2 4, 28 1, 7 1, 7 WellMark 7400 (actuator) 0.7
Oil 3 2, 20 2, 20 2, 20 Kimray T12 (2) 1.4, 3.4
Oil 4 1, 8 0, 0 0, 0 N/A N/A
Oil 5 6, 55 3, 27 3, 27 Kimray T12, WellMark 7400, WellMark 7400 (actuator) 3.1*^, 0.3, 1.2
Gas 1 1, 17 1, 17 0, 0 N/A N/A
Gas 2 4, 57 4, 57 2, 29 Kimray T12, WellMark 6900 0.4, 1.6*
Gas 3 5, 100 3, 60 3, 60 Kimray T12, WellMark 6900 (2) 0.3, 4.5*, 0.6
1

Defined as malfunctioning (malf.) if continuous emissions > 0.2 scf/h for IPCs or > 6 scf/hr for CPCs [assumes a low bleed category for continuous PCs (9)]. All measurements were HVS, except

(*)

by Alicat MFMs. Emission rates are whole gas at standard conditions with gas stream composition correction factors applied.

(^)

Multiple PC systems with hidden tubing, location of emission not identified, 3.1 scf/h arbitrarily assigned to Kimray T12.